User talk:Eaglesgirl

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Well done[edit]

Good job on setting up your account, Eaglesgirl. Let me know if I can do anything as you go along. 'Official' Wikiversity welcome below. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Social psychology (psychology)/Participants/Welcome, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon Button sig.png in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may


And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Crystal Clear app gnome.png
Jack-Russell-Terrier.jpg

Woof! My name is Jack(Russell). I am a dog and a Wikiversity mascot. I am pretty new around Wikiversity. Perhaps we can learn together! Tail wag...

Re:Week 3[edit]

>how I am supposed to write this e-portfolio: my view: so, that others get the urge to reply :-) And I like that you say that you are going to update it. It is a wiki - a wiki consists of changes. And this probably also gives one less pressure when writing here.

>order of importance: well that depends on ones senses: "looks and money" you see already from far and that already then starts influencing oneself (positive or negative). How was that with: the first 5 seconds decide if you like someone ? The same ordering should also be made by other people in other contexts (e.g. homeless, 80 year old, 8 year old, ...). Why don't you take this as opportunity to ask other people ? You can then present the results of the experiment here ?

>I guess this is just part of human nature and is something that can never be changed.: if one wanna change this, it needs "earthquakes", which makes one feel, that the categorizing was not good. So you rethink the categories always again. Probably one needs to think more about the specific people - making sure that one realizes what one thinks. ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 17:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up these are all very good points which I have taken on bored and will now consider more when I am writing my e-portfolio. I appreciate the time you have taken to express your ideas and points to me. Thanks again. Eaglesgirl

Well done on using your talk page, Eaglesgirl to interact with "the world" :). Great to see. One little tip. When you write a message on your talk page, you can "sign" it by leaving four tildes like this ~~~~ or use the little Signature.png button. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


Cool thanks Jtneill its quite exciting I am learning something new about this everyday here is a practice sign off --203.129.56.198 14:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Eaglesgirl

You are the first to reply back from all the students :-) Well done. ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 18:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

No worries I didn't want you to think I was being rude and ignoring you --203.129.56.198 01:12, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Eaglesgirl

No worries. I know that for many people wikis are new terrain. With time everything will get settled. Happy writing then, ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 06:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

E-portfolio Feedback for Eaglesgirl[edit]

Hi Eaglesgirl,

Thanks for participating in the social psychology unit. I have read your e-portfolio and have provided some feedback below. The marks will put be posted on WebCT 24 or 25 November. I will email the discussion list when they are available. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments, concerns, questions. I also welcome your feedback here.

Regularity/Continuity[edit]

Regular engagement evident, particular with the lectures is evident (no Environmental psychology?), somewhat with the tutorials (no Australian Zeitgeist?), not so much with the textbook and readings; 20 edits. (P-CR)

Depth/Insightfulness[edit]

Depth of engagement was quite refreshing; clearly you were listening, thinking, relating to your own life and situations, etc. which was great to see. Perhaps some links to related sources could be made, references, use of images, etc. (CR)

Overall/General/Other[edit]

No comment

Contributions/Statistics[edit]

Sincerely, James Neill - talk - email

P.S. If you are dissatisfied with the marking and feedback, please see the marking dispute process.