User:JWSchmidt/Blog/11 May 2007

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is part of
JWSchmidt's Wikiversity blog
Feel free to add comments.
16 August 2015 - Wiki Studies
16 April 2011 - Openness
29 January 2011 - Drama Queens
13 June 2010 - Bull
5 April 2010 - Breaches
22 September - Experts
27 January - Your Banned
14 January 2009 - Wikiversity Bans
14 November - Custodianship
19 October - Review Part II
10 October - My vacation
16 September - Moulton
15 September - Forking
7 September - Distorting
27 August - Wikipedia studies
1 March 2008 - The real world
12 January - Fair Use and the GFDL
2 January 2008 - Wiki Council
---- start 2008 ----
31 December - Participatory Learning
19 December - Foundation Changes
1 December - Changing the GFDL?
13 November - What is Wikiversity?
10 November - Expert editors (part II)
14 October 2007 - Vandal Wiki
20 September - Collaborative video interface
4 September - Open Source Crusade
31 August - CheckUser
4 August - Collaborative videos
20 July - Options for video-in-wiki
1 July - Networking Web 2.0 Websites
7 June 2007 - GFDL violations
27 May - Wikiversity namespace
22 May 2007 - Wikiversity tagline
20 May - The newbie game
16 May - Tangled Hierarchies
12 May - Navigation boxes
11 May 2007 - Forced editing
9 May - Wikipedia Learning
6 May - Music collaborations
25 Mar - Reliable Sources
17 Mar - Version flagging
11 Mar - Research policy discussion
10 Mar 2007 - Credentials
3 Mar - Free media files
28 Feb - Delete or develop?
27 Feb 2007 - Main Page
25 Feb - Science and Protoscience
23 Feb - Complementing Wikipedia
21 Feb - Copyleft media files
19 Feb - Gratis versus Libre
18 Feb 2007 - Referees
16 Feb - MediaWiki interface
15 Feb - Content development projects
14 Feb - Scope of Research
13 Feb 2007 - Review Board
12 Feb - Rounded corners
11 Feb - Open vs free content
10 Feb - Research guidelines
9 Feb - Learning resource diversity
8 February - Wikiversity referees.
7 February 2007 - Wikio.
5 February - Research policy.
2 February - Portal cleanup done.
31 January - Reliable sources.
29 January - Learning projects and materials.
27 January - Recording voice chat.
25 January - Animated GIF files with GIMP.
23 January - User page cleanup.
21 January 2007 - List of portals.
20 January - 2 more portals. "Courses"
19 Jan, - Portals and templates.
18 January site statistics - 20,000 pages.
18 January - Creating and organizing portals.
17 January - Categories of Wikiversity schools.
16 Jan. - Featured content development projects.
15 January - Wikiversity status at 5 months.
14 January - The "Topic:" namespace
13 January - Featured content
13 January - Wikiversity Bugs
12 January 2007 - Start of the blog
---- start 2007 ----
24 October, 2006 - Wikiversity history
26 April, 2005 - Wiki reality games
17 March, 2004 - Semantic prosthetic
edit this list

One of the first things that happened at Wikiversity was that the Main Page was redirected to Wikiversity:Main Page. The idea was that a main page such as exists at Wikipedia is really a page about the project, so it should be in the "Wikiversity:" namespace. Recently, User:CQ suggested that new visitors to Wikiversity should go to Main Page, a page in the main namespace. The main namespace is for learning resources.

Namespaces[edit]

According to Wikiversity:Namespaces, the "Help:" namespace is for, "instructions about how to edit Wikiversity webpages and participate within the Wikiversity community". When I wrote that, I was in the middle of a major effort to create portals for main namespace content and I was not thinking much about the "Help:" namespace. The earlier wording had been copied from Wikipedia and mentioned the fact that help pages for Wikimedia projects had originated in the "Wikipedia:" namespace and at the Meta wiki. I like the idea of having some core help pages at Meta for MediaWiki features that are common to all the sister projects. There should be a way to transclude such pages from Meta to Wikiversity.

Help vs Project[edit]

Wikipedia still has "help pages" (linked to from w:Help:Contents) that originated in the "Wikipedia:" namespace before the "Help:" namespace was invented. It is fun to look back at the origin of Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia and compare it to the current page and Wikiversity:Contributing to Wikiversity.

The Help:Editing page at Wikipedia goes back to June 2004 when it originated as a redirect to Wikipedia:How to edit a page. There are still pages at Meta, in the Wikipedia "Help:" namespace and in the "Wikipedia:" namespace that provide help for wiki webpage editing.

Which namespace for help at Wikiversity?[edit]

Wikiversity started with the advantage of having a "Help:" namespace from the start, so we have less duplication of help page content between the "Help:" namespace and the "Wikiversity:" namespace. Another form of help that has started to become more common are tutorials, wiki pages that have some obvious effort put into them in an attempt to create a user-friendly learning resource for wiki participants. In the case of Wikiversity, a wiki page that is designed as a learning resource can go into the main namespace, providing us with an option not available at Wikipedia.

I've started putting some "help pages" for learning about Wikiversity into the main namespace (Introduction to Wikiversity, Intermediate Wikiversity, Wikiversity (the rest of the story), 8:00 class). My intention is that these be learning projects where Wikiversity participants feel free to edit and explore just as they would at any other main namespace page. I started down this road very early by making pages such as Wiki. Rather than have an article about wiki in the "Wikiversity:" or "Help:" namespace I created a learning project about wiki.

Wiki 101[edit]

I originally thought of Wiki 101 as the first learning project that most visitors to Wikiversity would participate in (note: the page was created at the Meta wiki before the Wikiversity website was launched). I keep returning to the idea that new visitors to Wikiversity should be channeled into a learning project where they learn what a wiki is and then they are forced to edit. My belief is that most visitors to Wikiversity never think about hitting the edit button. If we forced them to edit, would more visitors realize that they are invited to edit and that Wikiversity exists as a website where they can learn by editing?