Talk:Naming conventions/Network naming conventions
Votes[edit source]
Comments[edit source]
There are two issues to consider in the current naming proposal: structural and linguistic. I think that this naming system is simpler than the structural aspects of the naming convention proposal and that the language used in the network proposal could invite more creativity in study areas and networking amongst them. In practice, it seems the structural proposal (divisions/subdivision/departments/etc) brings focus onto presenting extra unnecessary departmental structural elements which will detract from focusing quickly on developing learning resources and projects. A networking approach and language could invite a less territorial approach and more collaborative atmosphere to co-creating content. See discussion here for more points: [1]. Reswik 17:39, 21 August 2006 (UTC)