Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2010/Happiness

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Chapter feedback

This textbook chapter has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see what editing changes I have made whilst reading through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below or continuing to improve the chapter if you wish. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very impressive chapter (HD-level). Most impressive are the detailed, but selective descriptions of relevant research. The chapter was also well structured (although focus questions would have helped) and clearly a considerable amount of background reading and thinking has gone into the chapter. The quality of written expression is reasonably good (but paragraphs could be shorter and more proofreading needed). Detailed feedback is somewhat limited due to the extended submission. Also see my edits on the chapter for some suggestions.

Theory[edit source]

Research[edit source]

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Some paragraphs were overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
    2. The chapter could have benefited from developing clear focus questions. Getting comments on a chapter plan and/or chapter draft could have helped with this aspect.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 14:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

Overview[edit source]

  1. This is a high quality presentation - well done :)
  2. Wow! This was a creative, dynamic web-cam style presentation - something really different from narrated bullet-points!
  3. It felt like you were engaging with the viewer.
  4. Maybe take time to explain more about what will be covered if the viewer continues to watch.
  5. Use of key questions as a structure was effective.
  6. To improve I would probably have less content, just focus more on key points / take-home messages, and embellish these a bit e.g., with examples or research.
  7. Great end.

Content[edit source]

Conclusion[edit source]

Audio[edit source]

Video[edit source]

Meta-data[edit source]

Licensing[edit source]

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:01, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]