Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2026/Social connection and emotion regulation

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title Title and subtitle are correctly worded and use sentence casing 2. Headings Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement, however the headings lack sufficient incision into, and exposition of, the topic Consider using key theory(ies) as a stronger organising structure Don't use headings for quizzes, tables etc. Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Very good A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section A promising description of the problem/topic is planned or presented Highlight key theory(ies) and/or theoretical propositions/principles Develop closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 4. Key points Promising development Avoid too much general info about emotion regulation per se (there are other resources dedicated to this; link to these resources); concentrate instead on the relationship between SC and ER No development Provide more detailed edit summaries Select the best theories about this topic Select the best research about this topic Promising use of citations Conclusion is underway 5. Figure Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited 6. Learning feature Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies Promising use of quiz question(s) Place each quiz question in its most relevant section Promising use of table(s) 7. References Very good Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses Check and correct APA referencing style: italicisation Use en-dashes between page numbers 8. Resources See also Excellent Use alphabetical order External links Excellent 9. User page Very good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:48, 30 August 2026 (UTC)