Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2026/Self-stigma and emotion

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title Title and subtitle are correctly worded and use sentence casing Title and/or subtitle not correctly worded and/or didn't use sentence casing (fixed) User name removed from the page; for authorship see the page's edit history 2. Headings Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., consider using subheadings) Develop closer alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings 3. Overview Very good A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section; add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest A promising description of the problem/topic is planned or presented Develop closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Focus on self-stigma and emotion (that's the topic), rather than on motivation Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 2) 4. Key points Key points are well developed for each section Highlight the most relevant theories and synthesise the best research on the topic Conclusion is well underway What are the practical, take-home messages? (address the focus questions) 5. Figure An image is embedded, however, a clearly relevant figure is not presented and cited using APA style (see Tutorial 2) 6. Learning feature Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2) Promising use of scenarios/examples/case studies Use feature boxes for scenarios Promising use of quiz question(s) Use wiki-style quizzes for interactivity Promising use of table(s) Note that a table is not a figure Include citation for source of information in table 7. References Basic What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic? Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to the "External links" section Check and correct APA referencing style: italicisation 8. Resources See also Excellent External links To be developed (see Tutorial 2) Link to the most relevant external resources about this topic 9. User page Good Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided Rename the link to the book chapter to make it more user-friendly (see Tutorial 2) 10. Social contribution One out of three types of contributions made with direct link(s) to evidence. The other types of contribution are making: direct improvements to other chapters (past or current) posts about the unit or project on the UCLearn discussion forum Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 2)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:57, 1 September 2026 (UTC)