The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria . Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn . Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.
Title and/or subtitle not correctly worded and/or didn't use sentence casing (fixed)
Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., consider using subheadings)
Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
Are the headings based on genAI content ? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
Very good
Good
Basic
Insufficient
Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
Does this section include genAI content ? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
Promising scenario; could benefit from further development
Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest
A clear description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
The focus questions are well aligned with the sub-title and top-level headings
Use wiki-style bullet points (see Tutorial 2)
Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
Conclusion is well developed
Do these key points include genAI content ? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
Add a figure to the scenario
Figure caption(s) should include Figure X . ...
Cite each figure in the main text just before or around where the figure appears
Well done on creating and uploading your own image! —this can also be listed on your user page as a social contribution
Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2 )
Promising use of scenarios/examples/case studies
Promising use of quiz question(s)
Promising use of table(s)
Good
Use primary sources rather than a textbook (Reeve, 2024)
What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic?
Check and correct APA referencing style :
italicisation
See also
To be developed (see Tutorial 2 )
External links
One of two required external links provided
Use sentence casing
Basic
Very brief description about self – consider expanding
Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn . This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
A link to the book chapter is provided
No comment
None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 2 ). Looking ahead to the book chapter, see social contributions .
-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC) Reply