Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2026/Mood and cognitive performance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. Title and/or subtitle not correctly worded and/or didn't use sentence casing (fixed)
  1. Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g., consider using subheadings)
  2. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  3. Are the headings based on genAI content? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  1. Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Basic
  5. Insufficient
  6. Hasn't been developed – Needs scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  7. Does this section include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  8. Promising scenario; could benefit from further development
  9. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest
  10. A clear description of the problem/topic is planned or presented
  11. The focus questions are well aligned with the sub-title and top-level headings
  12. Use wiki-style bullet points (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section
  2. Conclusion is well developed
  3. Do these key points include genAI content? If so, this needs to be acknowledged in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  1. Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Add a figure to the scenario
  3. Figure caption(s) should include Figure X. ...
  4. Cite each figure in the main text just before or around where the figure appears
  5. Well done on creating and uploading your own image! —this can also be listed on your user page as a social contribution
  1. Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Promising use of scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Promising use of table(s)
  1. Good
  2. Use primary sources rather than a textbook (Reeve, 2024)
  3. What are the most relevant systematic reviews/meta-analyses about this topic?
  4. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. To be developed (see Tutorial 2)
  2. External links
    1. One of two required external links provided
    2. Use sentence casing
  3. Basic
  4. Very brief description about self – consider expanding
  5. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  6. A link to the book chapter is provided

No comment

  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 2). Looking ahead to the book chapter, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:16, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply