Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2026/Exercise gamification motivation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Overview

[edit source]

Looking good. I would suggest discussing some of the literature in this section. I say this because in the template it says to outline "psychological science". Jack4234 (discuss • contribs) 08:14, 20 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

[edit source]
Hi U3260591. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:01, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the plan. If you don't understand the feedback or would like further information, get in touch to discuss. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. Title and subtitle are correctly worded and use sentence casing
  1. See earlier comment about heading casing
  2. Promising 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure (i.e., use subheadings)
  3. Excellent alignment between sub-title, focus questions, and heading structure
  1. Excellent – Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, and focus questions
  2. Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment
  3. Solid development
  4. The scope is excellent (i.e., not too little/narrow or too big/broad)
  5. Select the best theories about this topic
  6. Select the best research about this topic
  7. Conclusion is underway
  8. What are the practical, take-home messages? (address the focus questions)

No comment

  1. Relevant figure(s) presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Figure caption(s) should include Figure X. ...
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1)
  1. Add in-text interwiki links for first mention of key terms to Wikipedia and/or book chapters (see Tutorial 2)
  2. Consider use of more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Consider including quiz question(s) about the take-home messages
  4. Also consider using tables to summarise key information
  1. Very good
  2. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  3. Check and correct APA referencing style:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
  1. See also
    1. Very good
    2. Use internal link style for Wikipedia links (see Tutorial 2)
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 2)
  1. Used effectively
  2. Brief description about self – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. The Wikiversity talk page link goes an edit rather than read interface

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:01, 30 August 2026 (UTC)Reply