PlanetPhysics/Examples of Functor Categories
Introduction[edit | edit source]
Let us recall the essential data required to define functor categories. One requires two arbitrary categories that, in principle, could be large ones, and , and also the class (alternatively denoted as ) of all covariant functors from to . For any two such functors , and , the class of all natural transformations from to is denoted by , (or simply denoted by ). In the particular case when is a set one can still define for a small category , the set . Thus, (cf. p. 62 in [1]), when is a small category the class of natural transformations from to may be viewed as a subclass of the cartesian product , and because the latter is a set so is as well. Therefore, with the categorical law of composition of natural transformations of functors, and for being small, satisfies the conditions for the definition of a category, and it is in fact a functor category.
Examples[edit | edit source]
- Let us consider to be a small abelian category and let be the category of finite Abelian (or commutative) groups, as well as the set of all covariant functors from to . Then, one can show by following the steps defined in the definition of a functor category that , or thus defined is an Abelian functor category .
- Let be a small category of finite Abelian (or commutative) groups and, also let be a small category of group-groupoids, that is, group objects in the category of groupoids. Then, one can show that the imbedding functors : from into form a functor category .
- In the general case when is not small, the proper class may be endowed with the structure of a supercategory defined as any formal interpretation of ETAS with the usual categorical composition law for natural transformations of functors; similarly, one can construct a meta-category called the supercategory of all functor categories .