Jump to content

Deductive Logic/Categorical Sentence Schemata/Example Modus Festino (EIO-2) syllogisms

From Wikiversity

Understanding Modus Festino (EIO-2)[1]

Role Quantity–Quality Logical Form
Major Premise (E) Universal Negative No P are M
Minor Premise (I) Particular Affirmative Some S are M
Conclusion (O) Particular Negative ∴ Some S are not P

Figure 2 rule: the middle term (M) is predicate in both premises.

The reasoning excludes from P those S that share M, because P is wholly outside M.


Ten Valid Modus Festino (EIO-2) Syllogisms

# Major Premise (E) Minor Premise (I) Conclusion (O)
1 No mammals are cold-blooded. Some reptiles are cold-blooded. ∴ Some reptiles are not mammals.
2 No machines are living beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not living beings.
3 No rectangles are circles. Some wheels are circles. ∴ Some wheels are not rectangles.
4 No poets are mathematicians. Some artists are poets. ∴ Some artists are not mathematicians.
5 No liars are trustworthy people. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy people.
6 No birds are mammals. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals.
7 No laws are emotions. Some feelings are emotions. ∴ Some feelings are not laws.
8 No metals are plants. Some trees are plants. ∴ Some trees are not metals.
9 No oceans are deserts. Some ecosystems are deserts. ∴ Some ecosystems are not oceans.
10 No fools are wise men. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise men.

All ten conform to: No P are M ; Some S are M ; ∴ Some S are not P.


Valid vs. Invalid Festino Comparisons

# Valid Example Invalid Example Why Invalid
1 No mammals are cold-blooded. Some reptiles are cold-blooded. ∴ Some reptiles are not mammals. No cold-blooded creatures are mammals. Some reptiles are cold-blooded. ∴ Some reptiles are not mammals. Reverses major premise → M not predicate in both premises → wrong figure.
2 No machines are living beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not living beings. All machines are living beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not living beings. Major affirmative (A) → wrong mood (A I O).
3 No rectangles are circles. Some wheels are circles. ∴ Some wheels are not rectangles. No circles are rectangles. Some wheels are circles. ∴ Some wheels are not rectangles. Major reversed → M subject once only → figure 3.
4 No poets are mathematicians. Some artists are poets. ∴ Some artists are not mathematicians. No mathematicians are poets. Some artists are poets. ∴ Some artists are not mathematicians. Major reversed → M subject not predicate in major.
5 No liars are trustworthy people. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy people. All liars are untrustworthy. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy. Major affirmative → no negative premise to justify negative conclusion.
6 No birds are mammals. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals. No mammals are birds. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals. Reversed major → M subject not predicate.
7 No laws are emotions. Some feelings are emotions. ∴ Some feelings are not laws. No emotions are laws. Some feelings are emotions. ∴ Some feelings are not laws. Major reversed → violates 2nd-figure structure.
8 No metals are plants. Some trees are plants. ∴Some trees are not metals. No plants are metals. Some trees are plants. ∴Some trees are not metals. Middle term not predicate in both premises → wrong figure.
9 No oceans are deserts. Some ecosystems are deserts. ∴ Some ecosystems are not oceans. All oceans are water bodies. Some ecosystems are deserts. ∴ Some ecosystems are not oceans. Major affirmative → mood A I O invalid.
10 No fools are wise men. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise men. No wise men are fools. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise men. Major reversed → figure 3 instead of 2.

Typical Errors in Invalid Festino Forms

Fallacy Explanation
Wrong Figure In Festino, M must be predicate in both premises; many invalid examples break this rule.
Wrong Mood (A I O) If the major is affirmative (A), there is no negative premise to support a negative conclusion.
Reversed Major Premise Switching “No P are M” to “No M are P” changes the figure (usually to 3rd).
Illicit Middle Term Middle term not distributed in either premise, so S and P remain unconnected.
Illicit Process of Term A term distributed in the conclusion but undistributed in its premise.

Summary of Modus Festino (EIO-2)

Property Description
Mood E I O (Universal Negative + Particular Affirmative → Particular Negative)
Figure 2 (M predicate in both premises)
Form No P are M; Some S are M; ∴ Some S are not P
Conclusion Type Particular Negative (O)
Essence of Validity Some S share M that is excluded from P; therefore those S cannot be P.
  1. ChatGPT generated this text responding to the prompt: “Provide 10 valid examples of Modus Festino (EIO-2) syllogisms. Follow that by a table comparing 10 Valid vs. Invalid “Modus Festino” Syllogisms indicating why each is invalid.”