Jump to content

Deductive Logic/Categorical Sentence Schemata/Example Modus Ferio (EIO-1) syllogisms

From Wikiversity

Understanding Modus Ferio (EIO-1)[1]

Role Quantity–Quality Logical Form
Major Premise (E) Universal Negative No M are P
Minor Premise (I) Particular Affirmative Some S are M
Conclusion (O) Particular Negative ∴ Some S are not P

Figure 1 rule: the middle term (M) is subject of the major and predicate of the minor.

The reasoning excludes from P those S that are connected to M.


Ten Valid Modus Ferio (EIO-1) Syllogisms

# Major Premise (E) Minor Premise (I) Conclusion (O)
1 No mammals are cold-blooded. Some dogs are mammals. ∴ Some dogs are not cold-blooded.
2 No machines are conscious beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not conscious beings.
3 No rectangles are circles. Some squares are rectangles. ∴ Some squares are not circles.
4 No liars are trustworthy people. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy people.
5 No poisons are safe foods. Some mushrooms are poisons. ∴ Some mushrooms are not safe foods.
6 No birds are mammals. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals.
7 No laws are unjust acts. Some statutes are laws. ∴ Some statutes are not unjust acts.
8 No metals are organic compounds. Some coins are metals. ∴ Some coins are not organic compounds.
9 No oceans are fresh-water bodies. Some seas are oceans. ∴ Some seas are not fresh-water bodies.
10 No fools are wise people. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise people.

All ten satisfy: No M are P; Some S are M; ∴ Some S are not P.


Valid vs. Invalid Ferio Syllogisms Comparison

# Valid Example Invalid Example Why Invalid
1 No mammals are cold-blooded. Some dogs are mammals. ∴ Some dogs are not cold-blooded. No cold-blooded creatures are mammals. Some dogs are mammals. ∴ Some dogs are not cold-blooded. Reverses major premise → M no longer subject in major → wrong figure.
2 No machines are conscious beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not conscious beings. All machines are conscious beings. Some computers are machines. ∴ Some computers are not conscious beings. Major affirmative (A) → mood A I O invalid in figure 1.
3 No rectangles are circles. Some squares are rectangles. ∴ Some squares are not circles. No circles are rectangles. Some squares are rectangles. ∴ Some squares are not circles. Major reversed → M predicate in major → figure 2, not 1.
4 No liars are trustworthy people. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy people. No trustworthy people are liars. Some politicians are liars. ∴ Some politicians are not trustworthy people. Middle term predicate in major → wrong figure.
5 No poisons are safe foods. Some mushrooms are poisons. ∴ Some mushrooms are not safe foods. All poisons are unsafe foods. Some mushrooms are poisons. ∴ Some mushrooms are not safe foods. Major affirmative (A) → mood A I O invalid.
6 No birds are mammals. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals. No mammals are birds. Some sparrows are birds. ∴ Some sparrows are not mammals. Major reversed → middle term predicate in major.
7 No laws are unjust acts. Some statutes are laws. ∴ Some statutes are not unjust acts. No unjust acts are laws. Some statutes are laws. ∴ Some statutes are not unjust acts. Improper figure → M predicate in major.
8 No metals are organic compounds. Some coins are metals. ∴ Some coins are not organic compounds. No organic compounds are metals. Some coins are metals. ∴ Some coins are not organic compounds. Major reversed → figure error.
9 No oceans are fresh-water bodies. Some seas are oceans. ∴ Some seas are not fresh-water bodies. All oceans are salt-water bodies. Some seas are oceans. ∴ Some seas are not fresh-water bodies. Major affirmative → invalid mood.
10 No fools are wise people. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise people. No wise people are fools. Some humans are fools. ∴ Some humans are not wise people. Major reversed → middle term predicate in major.

Frequent Invalidity Causes in “Ferio” Mistakes

Fallacy Explanation
Wrong Figure M must be subject in the major and predicate in the minor (1st figure). Reversing breaks the link between S and P.
Wrong Mood (A I O) Major must be negative (E); if affirmative (A), no exclusion is asserted.
Illicit Middle Term Middle term undistributed or not linked to both S and P.
Illicit Process of Term Term distributed in conclusion but not in premise.
Existential Fallacy All-universal premises cannot yield a particular conclusion (but Ferio avoids this by having a particular minor).

Summary of Modus Ferio (EIO-1)

Property Description
Mood E I O (Universal Negative + Particular Affirmative → Particular Negative)
Figure 1
Form No M are P; Some S are M; ∴ Some S are not P.
Middle Term Placement Subject in major, predicate in minor.
Conclusion Type Particular Negative (O).
Essence of Validity The subset of S that belongs to M is excluded from P because M is excluded from P.
  1. ChatGPT generated this text responding to the prompt: “Provide 10 valid examples of Modus Ferio (EIO-1) syllogisms. Follow that by a table comparing 10 Valid vs. Invalid “Modus Ferio” Syllogisms indicating why each is invalid.”