Jump to content

Deductive Logic/Categorical Sentence Schemata/Example Modus Diamatis (IAI-4) syllogisms

From Wikiversity

Understanding Modus Dimaris (IAI-4)[1]

Mood: I A I

Figure: 4

Canonical Form

Role Statement type Example structure
Major Premise (I) Some P are M
Minor Premise (A) All M are S
Conclusion (I) Therefore, some S are P

Middle term (M): Predicate of the major, subject of the minor.

Logic: Since some P belong to M and all M belong to S, at least some S must contain those P.


Ten Valid Modus Dimaris (IAI-4) Syllogisms

# Major Premise (I) Minor Premise (A) Conclusion (I)
1 Some mammals are aquatic creatures. All aquatic creatures are animals. ∴ Some animals are mammals.
2 Some students are musicians. All musicians are artists. ∴ Some artists are students.
3 Some rectangles are squares. All squares are polygons. ∴ Some polygons are rectangles.
4 Some philosophers are scientists. All scientists are thinkers. ∴ Some thinkers are philosophers.
5 Some poets are teachers. All teachers are educators. ∴ Some educators are poets.
6 Some trees are evergreens. All evergreens are plants. ∴ Some plants are trees.
7 Some laws are unjust. All unjust acts are moral failures. ∴ Some moral failures are laws.
8 Some metals are magnetic materials. All magnetic materials are physical substances. ∴ Some physical substances are metals.
9 Some books are novels. All novels are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are books.
10 Some humans are artists. All artists are creative beings. ∴ Some creative beings are humans.

Each follows IAI-4:

Some P are M; All M are S; ∴ Some S are P.


Table — Valid vs. Invalid Dimaris Syllogisms

# Valid Example Invalid Example Why Invalid
1 Some mammals are aquatic creatures. All aquatic creatures are animals. ∴ Some animals are mammals. All mammals are aquatic creatures. All aquatic creatures are animals. ∴ Some animals are mammals. Major is universal (A); middle term not particular → wrong mood (A A I).
2 Some students are musicians. All musicians are artists. ∴ Some artists are students. Some artists are musicians. All musicians are students. ∴ Some students are artists. Middle term not in proper position (predicate → subject). Figure error.
3 Some rectangles are squares. All squares are polygons. ∴ Some polygons are rectangles. Some polygons are squares. All squares are rectangles. ∴ Some polygons are rectangles. Middle term reversed → violates 4th-figure structure.
4 Some philosophers are scientists. All scientists are thinkers. ∴ Some thinkers are philosophers. Some scientists are philosophers. All scientists are thinkers. ∴ Some thinkers are philosophers. Middle term appears as subject in both premises → becomes 3rd figure.
5 Some poets are teachers. All teachers are educators. ∴ Some educators are poets. Some educators are teachers. All teachers are poets. ∴ Some educators are poets. Figure error; M not predicate in major.
6 Some trees are evergreens. All evergreens are plants. ∴ Some plants are trees. Some plants are evergreens. All evergreens are trees. ∴ Some plants are trees. Middle term reversed; invalid figure.
7 Some laws are unjust. All unjust acts are moral failures. ∴ Some moral failures are laws. Some unjust acts are laws. All unjust acts are moral failures. ∴ Some moral failures are laws. M subject in both premises → figure 3, not 4.
8 Some metals are magnetic materials. All magnetic materials are physical substances. ∴Some physical substances are metals. All metals are magnetic materials. All magnetic materials are physical substances. ∴ Some physical substances are metals. Mood A A I (not I A I) → middle term not particularized.
9 Some books are novels. All novels are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are books. Some novels are books. All novels are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are books. Improper figure; M must be predicate in major.
10 Some humans are artists. All artists are creative beings. ∴ Some creative beings are humans. All humans are artists. All artists are creative beings. ∴ All creative beings are humans. Illicit universal conclusion from universal premises; violates existential rule.

Common Fallacies in “Invalid Dimaris” Forms

Fallacy Description
Wrong Mood (A A I, A I I) Major must be particular affirmative; otherwise the middle term isn’t particularized.
Figure Violation Middle term must be predicate in the major and subject in the minor (4th-figure rule).
Illicit Middle Term Middle term undistributed or wrongly placed; fails to connect S and P properly.
Illicit Universal Conclusion From all-universal premises one cannot infer a universal conclusion.
Conversion Fallacy Swapping subject/predicate changes figure and breaks validity.

Summary: Modus Dimaris (IAI-4)

Property Description
Mood I A I (Some / All / Some)
Figure 4
Form Some P are M; All M are S; ∴ Some S are P.
Middle Term Placement Predicate in major, subject in minor.
Conclusion Type Particular affirmative (I).
Essence of Validity At least one P overlaps with M, and all M lie within S — so those P must also lie within S.
  1. ChatGPT generated this text responding to the prompt: “Provide 10 valid examples of Modus Diamatis (IAI-4) syllogisms. Follow that by a table comparing 10 Valid vs. Invalid “Modus Diamatis” Syllogisms indicating why each is invalid”.