Jump to content

Deductive Logic/Categorical Sentence Schemata/Example Modus Bocardo (OAO-3) syllogisms

From Wikiversity

Understanding Modus Bocardo (OAO–3)[1]

Role Quantity–Quality Logical Form
Major Premise (O) Particular Negative Some M are not P
Minor Premise (A) Universal Affirmative All M are S
Conclusion (O) Particular Negative ∴ Some S are not P

Figure 3 rule:

The middle term (M) is subject of both premises.

The reasoning holds because some M’s (that are not P) are included in S (since all M are S), so those S must not be P.


Ten Valid Modus Bocardo (OAO–3) Syllogisms

# Major Premise (O) Minor Premise (A) Conclusion (O)
1 Some mammals are not carnivores. All mammals are animals. ∴ Some animals are not carnivores.
2 Some metals are not magnetic. All metals are elements. ∴ Some elements are not magnetic.
3 Some poets are not philosophers. All poets are writers. ∴ Some writers are not philosophers.
4 Some triangles are not equilateral. All triangles are polygons. ∴ Some polygons are not equilateral.
5 Some students are not athletes. All students are people. ∴ Some people are not athletes.
6 Some birds are not flyers. All birds are animals. ∴ Some animals are not flyers.
7 Some laws are not just. All laws are human creations. ∴ Some human creations are not just.
8 Some medicines are not safe. All medicines are chemical compounds. ∴ Some chemical compounds are not safe.
9 Some books are not novels. All books are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are not novels.
10 Some humans are not kind. All humans are animals. ∴ Some animals are not kind.

All follow: Some M are not P; All M are S; ∴ Some S are not P.


Valid vs. Invalid Bocardo Syllogisms Comparison

# Valid Example Invalid Example Why Invalid
1 Some mammals are not carnivores. All mammals are animals. ∴ Some animals are not carnivores. All mammals are not carnivores. All mammals are animals. ∴ Some animals are not carnivores. Major premise made universal (A→O error). Universal negative (A?) invalid mood (A A O).
2 Some metals are not magnetic. All metals are elements. ∴ Some elements are not magnetic. Some elements are not metals. All metals are elements. ∴ Some elements are not magnetic. Middle term misplaced — wrong figure (M not subject in both).
3 Some poets are not philosophers. All poets are writers. ∴ Some writers are not philosophers. Some writers are not poets. All poets are writers. ∴ Some writers are not philosophers. Middle term reversed in minor → figure violation.
4 Some triangles are not equilateral. All triangles are polygons. ∴ Some polygons are not equilateral. No triangles are equilateral. All triangles are polygons. ∴ Some polygons are not equilateral. Major premise universal negative (E) instead of particular (O) → wrong mood (E A O).
5 Some students are not athletes. All students are people. ∴ Some people are not athletes. Some athletes are not students. All students are people. ∴ Some people are not athletes. Middle term predicate once, subject once → not figure 3.
6 Some birds are not flyers. All birds are animals. ∴ Some animals are not flyers. Some animals are not birds. All birds are animals. ∴ Some animals are not flyers. Middle term mispositioned → violates 3rd figure structure.
7 Some laws are not just. All laws are human creations. ∴ Some human creations are not just. Some laws are unjust. All human creations are laws. ∴ Some human creations are not just. Reverses subject/predicate roles → figure 1 pattern.
8 Some medicines are not safe. All medicines are chemical compounds. ∴ Some chemical compounds are not safe. Some unsafe things are medicines. All medicines are chemical compounds. ∴ Some chemical compounds are not safe. Major premise not in proper form (O) → “unsafe things” breaks middle term role.
9 Some books are not novels. All books are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are not novels. No books are novels. All books are works of literature. ∴ Some works of literature are not novels. Major premise universal negative (E), not particular (O).
10 Some humans are not kind. All humans are animals. ∴ Some animals are not kind. Some animals are not humans. All humans are animals. ∴ Some animals are not kind. Middle term reversed in minor → wrong figure (becomes figure 1).

Common Fallacies in Invalid Bocardo Forms

Fallacy Description
Wrong Mood Major premise must be particular negative (O). If it’s universal negative (E) or affirmative (A), invalid.
Wrong Figure In figure 3, middle term must be subject in both premises; reversing one breaks the structure.
Illicit Middle Term M not distributed or positioned properly.
Illicit Major Term A term distributed in the conclusion but not in its premise.
Existential Error If both premises are universal, a particular conclusion (O) is unjustified.
Reversed Roles Switching subject and predicate destroys figure structure.

Summary of Modus Bocardo (OAO–3)

Property Description
Mood O A O (Particular Negative + Universal Affirmative → Particular Negative)
Figure 3 (M subject in both premises)
Form Some M are not P; All M are S; ∴ Some S are not P
Conclusion Type Particular Negative (O)
Essence of Validity Some of the M that are not P must also be S (since all M are S); therefore, some S are not P.
  1. ChatGPT generated this text responding to the prompt: “Provide 10 valid examples of Modus Bocardo (OAO-3) syllogisms. Follow that by a table comparing 10 Valid vs. Invalid “Modus Bocardo” Syllogisms indicating why each is invalid.”