Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519173646
Contents |
I mean, [edit]
This revision=20070519174254
- Argument:
My "A one-liner may go here" is a reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here." and "Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose." replies "Can there be sections within treads". But that latter section was created articficailly (without pressing the "reply button") and so it hijacked the reply link to the previous comment. Or we can say, two different comments (and two different replies) were merged. That makes the questions and answers crossed. So it is a little confusing.
In short, Don't create your own section. Use the "reply" link. Once you have created a section, you are free to edit your previous comments, correct mistakes, etc.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[1]
IF you find this text too small [edit]
This revision=20070519174550
- Argument:
go to a subthread by pressing the edit button.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[2]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519174550
Problem fixed by reintroducing a thread [edit]
This revision=20070519183132
- Comment: See above.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[3]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519183132
Complicated [edit]
- Comment:So far, this is too complicated for me to understand. I'm adding this comment as an experiment. -- CQ 19:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
--CQ 19:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[4]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521195901