Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519162600
Questions? Comments? [edit]
This revision=20070519163246
- Argument:
--Hillgentleman|Talk 16:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[1]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519163246
Testing the "external link" [edit]
This revision=20070519101448
- Argument:I'm guessing that my comment goes here.
--JWSchmidt 17:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
This revision=20070519181349
- Argument: adding a thread to a deadend.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here" [2]
A one-liner may go here. [edit]
This revision=20070519182021
- Argument: The script is becoming too small.
Here we can elaborate! --Hillgentleman|Talk 18:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[3]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519182021
Perhaps I should change "argument" to "comment". [edit]
This revision=20070519182319
- Argument: But I still like argument!
--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[4]
[edit]
This revision=20070519182832
- Comment:
--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[5]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519182832
Testing sections [edit]
Can there be sections within threads? --JWSchmidt 17:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[6]
A one liner may go here. [edit]
This revision=20070519172843
Argument: Here we can elaborate....
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[7]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519172843
Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose. [edit]
This revision=20070519173345
- Argument: BASEPAGENAME/1/1/1/1/1... can only produce a linear structure.
Originally I tried REVISIONID, which didn't work: if we substitute a revisionid, we get blank. --Hillgentleman|Talk 17:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[8]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519173345
And try not to create your own section. [edit]
This revision=20070519173646
- Argument: Use the "reply link" to create a new section, or else you would create a dead end.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[9]
I mean, [edit]
This revision=20070519174254
- Argument:
My "A one-liner may go here" is a reply to ":I'm guessing that my comment goes here." and "Here is the point: the REVISIONTIMESTAMP is precisely for that purpose." replies "Can there be sections within treads". But that latter section was created articficailly (without pressing the "reply button") and so it hijacked the reply link to the previous comment. Or we can say, two different comments (and two different replies) were merged. That makes the questions and answers crossed. So it is a little confusing.
In short, Don't create your own section. Use the "reply" link. Once you have created a section, you are free to edit your previous comments, correct mistakes, etc.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[10]
IF you find this text too small [edit]
This revision=20070519174550
- Argument:
go to a subthread by pressing the edit button.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[11]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519174550
Problem fixed by reintroducing a thread [edit]
This revision=20070519183132
- Comment: See above.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 18:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[12]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519183132
Complicated [edit]
- Comment:So far, this is too complicated for me to understand. I'm adding this comment as an experiment. -- CQ 19:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
--CQ 19:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[13]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070521195901
Using the edit "button" for the new section that I started with the "external link" reply "button". --JWSchmidt 17:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
It is better to use the "edit" button only for correcting mistakes. [edit]
This revision=20070519173026
- Argument: To state a new point, use the "Reply" link, or else your comment would be a dead end.
--Hillgentleman|Talk 17:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- reply[14]
Wikiversity:Threaded discussions with NavFrames with subst/20070519173026