User talk:Una Smith
Hello Una Smith, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. When leaving comments for others to read, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone keep track of who is writing messages. The signature icon
in the edit window makes it simple. To help you get started:
- Take a guided tour and learn how to edit;
- Explore our learning projects;
Also, don't forget to experiment with the links to your left. Be bold, and see you around Wikiversity! --JWSchmidt 05:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
Search and rescue resource [edit]
Hi Una, I unfortunately missed the recent discussion you started at Wikiversity:Colloquium#Is this the place? - but I've just left a question there. I'd be very interested in where you chose and why - specifically, what it affords that Wikiversity doesn't. Thanks. Cormaggio talk 20:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Re: Clinical case nr. 2 [edit]
Thanks for your great copy-editing, it's much appreciated. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:12, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problem with Image:SAR0801map2a.png [edit]
| Thanks for uploading Image:SAR0801map2a.png, but: | ||
| This file may soon be deleted, unless some copyright information on the file can be determined. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about what files are included because of copyright law (see Wikiversity's Copyright policy). | ||
Wikiversity accepts three types of copyrighted works, open content, public domain, and fair use. Please signify what type of copyright the file uses by placing a copyright template on the file page like this: {{TemplateName}} |
||
| Wikiversity requires that the work's copyright holder be acknowledged. The copyright holder is usually the work's creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Please include this information by placing {{information}} on the file page and filling it out. | ||
| Please signify the copyright information for any other files you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that files without this important information or with incorrect information can be deleted by a custodian. | ||
| If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page or the Wikiversity community at the Colloquium. Thank you. | ||
Crochet.david 13:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- I will check with my source. --Una Smith 22:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Can you check the 4th point on the copyright alert box over. Thanks.Crochet.david 14:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
-
-
- How does one undelete files on Wikiversity? --Una Smith 15:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Which files am I supposed to check? The all (or at least the recent ones) have license tags already. In fact, I thought I had properly tagged the file that was deleted. Once it is undeleted I will tag it (again). --Una Smith 15:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- this and this.Crochet.david 15:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Which files am I supposed to check? The all (or at least the recent ones) have license tags already. In fact, I thought I had properly tagged the file that was deleted. Once it is undeleted I will tag it (again). --Una Smith 15:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
-
Images on SAR mission 2008 01 [edit]
Hi! I'm involved in a bit of a clean-up of non-free files used on Wikiversity, and I came across File:Summit3.jpg, File:DOG TRAINING TRAIL II.JPG and File:F41088a1-crop.jpg. The resource is extremely impressive, but since those files were uploaded with come to have tighter restrictions on fair-use images based on a resolution from the Wikimedia Foundation, in that non-free images need to meet the exemption doctrine policy. What that generally means in practice is that we need to add a fair use rationale to go with the fair use claim. This isn't a big deal, and I was going to write one (and will happily try and do so if I don't hear back from you), but I thought I'd stop by and confirm that those particular images are needed, and that a free equivalent won't do the job. My guess is a definite yes for both maps, so the only one I had doubt over was the tricycle, in that there are some free-use images of tricycles available. :) Thus my first query is whether or not you feel the photo has to be of that particular tricycle (in which case I'll just state that in the rationale), or if a free-use equivalent (of the same or different colour, and a different model) would be ok from your end. The second quick question is whether or not you know the source of the files, so I can add a reference.
Sorry to drop this sort of administration stuff on you. My plan is to get things back in line with policy, so that the images which are a real concern can be handled easier. :) - Bilby 07:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)