User:JWSchmidt/Blog/21 February 2007
From Wikiversity
|
This page is part of JWSchmidt's Wikiversity blog Feel free to add comments. |
| 22 September - Experts |
| 27 January - Your Banned |
| 14 January - Wikiversity Bans |
| 14 November - Custodianship |
| 19 October - Review Part II |
| 10 October - My vacation |
| 16 September - Moulton |
| 15 September - Forking |
| 7 September - Distorting |
| 27 August - Wikipedia studies |
| 1 March 2008 - The real world |
| 12 January - Fair Use and the GFDL |
| 2 January 2008 - Wiki Council |
| ---- start 2008 ---- |
| 31 December - Participatory Learning |
| 19 December - Foundation Changes |
| 1 December - Changing the GFDL? |
| 13 November - What is Wikiversity? |
| 10 November - Expert editors (part II) |
| 14 October 2007 - Vandal Wiki |
| 20 September - Collaborative video interface |
| 4 September - Open Source Crusade |
| 31 August - CheckUser |
| 4 August - Collaborative videos |
| 20 July - Options for video-in-wiki |
| 1 July - Networking Web 2.0 Websites |
| 7 June 2007 - GFDL violations |
| 27 May - Wikiversity namespace |
| 22 May 2007 - Wikiversity tagline |
| 20 May - The newbie game |
| 16 May - Tangled Hierarchies |
| 12 May - Navigation boxes |
| 11 May 2007 - Forced editing |
| 9 May - Wikipedia Learning |
| 6 May - Music collaborations |
| 25 Mar - Reliable Sources |
| 17 Mar - Version flagging |
| 11 Mar - Research policy discussion |
| 10 Mar 2007 - Credentials |
| 3 Mar - Free media files |
| 28 Feb - Delete or develop? |
| 27 Feb 2007 - Main Page |
| 25 Feb - Science and Protoscience |
| 23 Feb - Complementing Wikipedia |
| 21 Feb - Copyleft media files |
| 19 Feb - Gratis versus Libre |
| 18 Feb 2007 - Referees |
| 16 Feb - MediaWiki interface |
| 15 Feb - Content development projects |
| 14 Feb - Scope of Research |
| 13 Feb 2007 - Review Board |
| 12 Feb - Rounded corners |
| 11 Feb - Open vs free content |
| 10 Feb - Research guidelines |
| 9 Feb - Learning resource diversity |
| 8 February - Wikiversity referees. |
| 7 February 2007 - Wikio. |
| 5 February - Research policy. |
| 2 February - Portal cleanup done. |
| 31 January - Reliable sources. |
| 29 January - Learning projects and materials. |
| 27 January - Recording voice chat. |
| 25 January - Animated GIF files with GIMP. |
| 23 January - User page cleanup. |
| 21 January 2007 - List of portals. |
| 20 January - 2 more portals. "Courses" |
| 19 Jan, - Portals and templates. |
| 18 January site statistics - 20,000 pages. |
| 18 January - Creating and organizing portals. |
| 17 January - Categories of Wikiversity schools. |
| 16 Jan. - Featured content development projects. |
| 15 January - Wikiversity status at 5 months. |
| 14 January - The "Topic:" namespace |
| 13 January - Featured content |
| 13 January - Wikiversity Bugs |
| 12 January 2007 - Start of the blog |
| ---- start 2007 ---- |
| 24 October, 2006 - Wikiversity history |
| 26 April, 2005 - Wiki reality games |
| 17 March, 2004 - Semantic prosthetic |
| edit this list |
Copyleft media files
I added licensing information directly into the audio file for the Wiki Campus Radio test conference call.
is the new version of the file. I guess most people who might work with a GFDL file will be folks who copy the file. If the licensing information is in the audio channel, then it will be passed from listener to listener even under conditions where the file is not simply downloaded from Wikiversity. However, the files I usually make already include discussion of Wikiversity, so it is not clear that a bunch of mumbo-jumbo about copyleft licensing really adds that much for the typical listener.
In the case of more sophisticated folks who might be involved with making derivative works, it is not clear that there is any way to actually control what happens with licensing of derivative works. If a media file originally made by Wikiversity participants ended up getting diced and spliced and incorporated into various derivative works without correct attribution, would anyone really care? If not, then it might make more sense to just include in media files a short and user-friendly infomercial. Maybe the trick would be to convert the legalese into a fun infomercial.
Question about OGG. The original audio file for
that was produced by GarageBand was a 21.7 MB .m4a file. I originally used two different converters and Music Man made the smaller ogg file, that uploaded to Wikiversity as a 12,549 KB file. After adding the licensing information, the new audio file was a minute longer and was exported from GarageBand as a 22.7 MB .m4a file. The Music Man converter produced a 10,437 KB ogg file this time. In both cases, Music Man was using default settings....I'm not even sure if there is a way to control the quality of output. Listening to the new ogg, I suspect it is lower quality than the first version that did not include the licensing information. The QuickTime player indicates that both files are 44.1 kHz, but the older file was 108 kbits/sec while the new one is 87 kbits/sec. In both cases, the original .m4a files were 1441 kbits/sec. I do not see any way to control the bit rate of the output file using the Music Man converter.
I was originally biased towards Music Man over VLC because VLC explicitly says it is not great for file format conversion (they say it is mainly for capturing streams) and the first time I tried it, VLC was slow and made much larger files than Music Man. However, I now see that VLC allows you to select 64, 128, or 192 kbits/sec. The default is 192, which is why it was making larger files than Music Man (87-108 kbits/sec). I tried using VLC to make a 128 kbit/sec ogg, but I ended up with a damaged file that will not play in the QuickTime player but did open in Audacity. I used Audacity to save a new ogg file and it came out at 104 kbits/sec and 12.2 MB. Audacity has a setting for audio export quality; a 0-10 scale with the default in the middle. I tried saving another copy from Audacity at 7/10 on their quality scale and got a file that was 146 kbits/second and 16.5 MB.