User:Egm6321.f11.team4.allen/HW6
Contents |
Problem R*6.1 Solve Nonhomogeneous L2-ODE-CC [edit]
From Mtg 33-1
Given [edit]
Equation (1) p.32-5 is
.
Equation (1) p.16-5 is
.
Equation (2) p.16-5 is
.
Find [edit]
Find the PDEs that govern the integrating factor
for equation (1) p.32-5. Can you solve these PDEs for
?
Find
in terms of
.
Find the quadratic equation for
.
Find the reduced-order equation.
Use the IFM to solve (3) p.33-3.
Show that
.
Deduce the particular solution
for general excitation
.
Verify result with table of particular solutions for:
.
Solve the nonhomogeneous L2-ODE-CC (1) p.32-5 with
.
For the coefficients
, consider two different characteristic equations:
.
.
Determine the fundametal period of undamped free vibration, and plot the solution for the excitation
for about 5 periods, assuming zero initial conditions.
Solution Part 1 [edit]
We need equation (1) p.32-5 to satisfy the first exactness condition for N2-ODEs,
.
Hence, 
.
Using the second exactness condition {equations (1)-(2) p. 16-5}, we obtain the following PDEs:
.
.
Combine the two equations to obtain
.
The PDEs reduce to a single ODE that cannot be solved.
Solution Part 2.1 [edit]
We are given the trial solution as
.
So,
.
Then,
.
Differentiate the RHS to obtain,
.
Equate the two sides to obtain the three expressions below.
.
.
.
Rearrange the second and third equations to yield
.
.
.
Solution Part 2.2 [edit]
Using the last two equations, we can obtain the quadratic equation for
.
.
![\displaystyle \alpha*[a_1-\alpha a_2]=a_0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/6/3/e63b4e1c96cf0733df6487fc0bda21ff.png)


Solution Part 2.3 [edit]
The reduced-order equation is obtained using equations (1) p.33-2 and (2) p.33-1.
![\displaystyle \exp(\alpha t)[\bar a_1y'+\bar a_0y]=\int \exp(\alpha t)F(t)dt](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/6/f/46f464bc665b640626607906adb86954.png)

Solution Part 2.4 [edit]
Next, we will use the IFM to solve the reduced-order equation.
![\displaystyle \bar h(t)=\exp[\int \beta dt]=\exp(\beta t)](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/0/b/00bbfebd3d7cb6b36350df29aa67f19d.png)
where 

Divide the result of Part 2.3 by
to obtain B(s).

Then we can combine
into
to find
.
![\displaystyle y(t)=\frac{1}{\bar a_1[\exp(\beta t)]}\int^t [\exp((\beta-\alpha) s)] \left[ \int \exp(\alpha t)F(t)dt \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/7/4/c74f3a47a6665041767ceac277bea4f2.png)
Solution Part 2.5 [edit]
Rearrange
to
.
Substitute
to
.
That's equal to
and after rearranging one obtains
.
To reach the other equality, just set the equation equal to
instead of
.
.
Rearranging yields
.
Solution Part 2.6 [edit]
Referencing R5.7, the below equation is given for an Euler L2-ODE-CC.
.
After careful inspection, one can deduce that the particular solution is the last equation for Part 2.4 WITHOUT the constants of integration.
![\displaystyle y(t)=\frac{1}{\bar a_1[\exp(\beta t)]}\int^t [\exp((\beta-\alpha) s)] \left[ \int \exp(\alpha t)F(t)dt \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/7/4/c74f3a47a6665041767ceac277bea4f2.png)
Solution Part 2.7 [edit]




![\displaystyle \int e^{(\beta-\alpha)s} \left[ e^{(\alpha+b)s} \frac{(bs+\alpha s-1)}{(\alpha + b)^2} \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/f/9/5f9432e598644f57d7be13a5f51d9962.png)










NOTE: The following two integrals were performed using Wolfram|Alpha.
integrate t*exp((\alpha+b)*t) dt
integrate (exp((\beta+b)*s)*((b*s+\alpha*s-1)/((\alpha+b)^2)) ds
Now compare to the Table.




Other than the arbitrary constant numbering convention, they match.
Solution Part 2.8.1 [edit]
![\displaystyle y(t)=\frac{1}{\cancel{\bar a_1}[\exp(\beta t)]}\int^t [\exp((\beta-\alpha) s)] \left[ \int \exp(\alpha t)F(t)dt \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/f/2/8f2fd006ced17666992f24ea18312006.png)


![\displaystyle \int e^{(\alpha t)} [\tanh{t}] dt](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/6/5/c65ec8ad80245c4f12451a12f6eae258.png)




![\displaystyle \int^t e^{3s} \left[ e^{-s} - 2 \tan^{-1}(e^s) \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/4/b/74b33777c87c1cc6392b767a27c5ce80.png)
![\displaystyle \frac{1}{6}[e^{2s}+2\log(e^{2s}+1)-4e^{3s}(tan^{-1}(e^{-s}))]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/9/e/89e6d3a6b83e611377b82fac5797d8a9.png)
![\displaystyle y_P(t) = \frac{1}{6} \frac{[e^{2s}+2\log(e^{2s}+1)-4e^{3s}(tan^{-1}(e^{-s}))]}{e^{-2t}}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/e/b/1ebf7f32122c425764e1f918382c52ea.png)
NOTE: Wolfram|Alpha was used to determine the following integrals:
integrate (e^(-t)*tanh(t)) dt
integrate (e^(3s))(e^(-s)-2 tan^(-1)(e^(-s))) ds
Solution Part 2.8.2 [edit]

![\displaystyle y(t)=\frac{1}{\cancel{\bar a_1}[\exp(\beta t)]}\int^t [\exp((\beta-\alpha) s)] \left[ \int \exp(\alpha t)F(t)dt \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/f/2/8f2fd006ced17666992f24ea18312006.png)
![\displaystyle y(t)=e^{-4t} \int^t \cancel{e^{(\beta-\alpha)s}} \left[ \int e^{4t} F(t) dt \right] ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/0/9/4093d6d9753f76136004bb2515f32249.png)


![\displaystyle \int e^{4t} [\tanh{t}] dt](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/e/c/eecaf5b68b593b514eb798e2cb8464fe.png)

![\displaystyle \frac{1}{16} \left[ -8[Li_2 (-e^{2t})] - 8 e^{2t} + e^{4t} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/a/9/4a9042cb3f0c986ba9f6bc6d66d72dc5.png)
![\displaystyle y_P(t) = \frac{e^{-4}}{16} \left[ -8[Li_2 (-e^{2t})] - 8 e^{2t} + e^{4t} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/4/5/6452f309e45ae0fd4799222bd5465e2e.png)
where
is the polylogarithm function
NOTE: Wolfram|Alpha was used to determine the following integrals:
integrate ((e^(4t))(\tanh(t))) dt
integrate (-e^(2t)+(e^(4t)/4)+log(e^(2t)+1)) dt
Author [edit]
Egm6341.f11.team4.allen 10:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Problem R*6.2 - Show (1)p.34-6 agrees with King 2003 (1.6)p.8 [edit]
From Mtg 35-1
Given [edit]
Equation (1) p.34-6 is
.
Find [edit]
Show that Equation (1) p.34-6 agrees with King 2003 (1.6) p.8 which is
![\displaystyle y_P(x)=\int^x f(s)\left[\frac{u_1(s)u_2(x)-u_1(x)u_2(s)}{W(s)}\right]\,ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/e/e/2eeb47e80242f0eb2df154859bb3bb79.png)
with
.

Also, discuss the feasibility of the following choices for variation of parameters:
.
.
.
Solution [edit]
Starting with the HINT, we'll apply the following basic differentiation rule:
to find
.
So,
.
Next, we'll use integration by parts,
with the following:
.
.
.
.
![\displaystyle y_P(x) = u_1(x)\int\frac{1}{h(x)}\left[\int h(x)\frac{f(x)}{u_1(x)}\,dx\right]\,dx](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/8/8/9882dbc1c9dce4c2044a7e5daf95368c.png)

![\displaystyle y_P(x) = u_1(x) [uv - \int v du]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/9/a/19a7dbceab3890a63f310ec48a6a190d.png)
![\displaystyle y_P(x) = u_1(x) \left[ \frac{u_2(x)}{u_1(x)} \int h(s) \frac{f(s)}{u_1(s)}ds - \int \frac{u_2(s)}{u_1(s)} \frac{h(s)f(s)}{u_1(s)} ds \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/4/a/f4a6caef33b6ea185fe19c7ca2c70cc4.png)



![\displaystyle y_P(x)=\int^x f(s)\left[\frac{u_1(s)u_2(x)-u_1(x)u_2(s)}{W(s)}\right]\,ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/e/e/2eeb47e80242f0eb2df154859bb3bb79.png)
with
.
.
.
.
.
left over terms without U and its derivatives.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
None of these alternative trial solutions are feasible because they don't produce the desired homogeneous equation that cancels out to simplify the equation. Also, there are several terms that do not contain
which were a requirement as well.