User:Egm6321.f11.team4.allen/HW3
Problem R3.1 - Show Eq. (1) p.13-2 is exact only if
(constant) and Eq. (1) p.12-4 is a particular equation [edit]
From Mtg 13-3
From Mtg 11-2
From Mtg 12-4
Given [edit]
Eq. (1) p.13-2 is
.
Eq. (2) p.11-2 is
.
Eq. (1) p.12-4 is
.
Find [edit]
Show that the N1-ODE (1) p.13-2 satisfies the condition (2) p.11-2 that an integrating factor
can be found to render it exact, only if
(constant).
Show that (1) p.13-2 includes (1) p.12-4 as a particular case.
Solution [edit]
Eq. (1) p. 13-2 can be written as
which yields the following:

.
These two equations yield the following when differentiated:

.
Now we plug these equations into Eq. (2) p. 11-2 to obtain
![\displaystyle n(x)=\frac{-1}{\bar b(x,y)c(y)}*[\bar b_x(x,y)c(y)-a(x)\bar c_y(x,y)]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/4/2/04210f6cb0abe95f7bd7b194166d203c.png)
This simplifies to
.
Since
&
cancel out, the formula reduces to
.
Rearranging the equation produces
.
If you differentiate the above equation by
, you obtain
because everything is a function of
or a constant.
This shows that
(constant) and not a function of
.
In order to show Eq. (1) p. 12-4 is a particular case of Eq. (1) p. 13-2, we must make two assumptions.
Those assumptions include
and
(constant).
Working first with
,
we have 
(left side is the general case and the right side is the particluar case).
With
, Eq. (1) p. 13-3 reduces to
.
Plug the above equation for
into the
which yields
.
The left side simplies becase
is absorbed into
and
is absorbed into
.
Working last with
,
we have 
(left side is the general case and the right side is the particluar case).
Since
, it can be absorbed into
.
Also,
because it is not a function of
.
This ultimately yields the particluar case,
.
Problem R*3.2 - Show Eq. (1) p.13-4 is exact or can be made exact by the IFM. Find the integrating factor h [edit]
From Mtg 13-4
Given [edit]
Eq. (1) p.13-2 is
or
.
Eq. (2) p.13-2 is
.
Eq. (1) p.13-3 is
.





So, after combining the above equations into Eq. (1) p.13-4 we obtain
Eq. (1) p.13-4 which is
.
Find [edit]
Show that Eq. (1) p. 13-4 either is exact or can be made exact by the IFM. Find the integrating factor
.
Solution [edit]
In order for Eq. (1) p. 13-4 to be exact, it must satisfy both conditions of exactness.
The first exactness condition requires the formula to be in the following form:
.
Eq. (1) p. 13-4 already satisfies the above requirement so it meets this condition.
The second exactness condition requires the formula to satisfy the following condition:
.
Differentiate the following equations,
and
,
to obtain
and
.
Clearly,
.
Since the equation is not exact, we must make it exact with the IFM.
Using
and 
with
,
, and
we have
.
Problem R*3.3 - Find an N1-ODE of the form (1) p. 13-2 and the First Integral, Phi [edit]
From Mtg 13-4
Given [edit]
Eq. (1) p.13-2 is
or
.
Eq. (2) p.13-2 is
.
Eq. (1) p.13-3 is
.
.
.
.
Find [edit]
Find an N1-ODE of the form (1) p. 13-2 that is either exact or can be made exact by the IFM.
Find the first integral
.
Solution [edit]
First solve for
and
.




Fill Eq. (1) p. 13-2 with the known values and you will obtain

This equation simplifies to
.
So, the above equation satisfies the first condition of exactness,
.
However, it fails to satisfy the second condition of exactness, as shown below.
The second exactness condition requires the formula to satisfy the following form:
.
Differentiate the following equations,
and
,
to obtain
and
.
Clearly,
.
Since the equation is not exact, we must make it exact with the IFM.
Using
and 
with
,
, and
we have
.
This simplies to
.
Multiply
and
which yields
.
Find
.


Using the above equations, you can integrate with respect to
or
which yields

.
Equate the equations above and solve for
which is

(constant) and Eq. (1) p.12-4 is a particular equation