User:Egm6321.f11.team1/report5
R*5.1 2nd Exactness Condition For n=2 Case of Nn-ODE (Method 2) [edit]
Given [edit]
Equivalent form of 2nd Exactness Condition for N2-ODEs[1]:
Coefficient equalities, located in previous reference above.
Note also that
and 
Find[2] [edit]
Show the following equality is true:
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
Applying the chain rule to
yields the following:

We know what
is defined to be, we can substitute in
and
and carry out the derivatives:


We can apply the same approach to
:


Adding
,
, and
according to Equation 4.7.1 yields our final solution:

|
|
R*5.2 Exactness of Bessel, Legendre, and Hermite [edit]
Given [edit]
Legendre L2-ODE-VC:
Bessel L2-ODE-VC:
Hermite L2-ODE-VC:
Exactness Conditions
-
- where

- where
-

-



- where

-
Find[3] [edit]
(1) Verify the exactness conditions of Legendre, Bessel, and Hermite, using both methods for the 2nd exactness condition.
(2) If Equation 5.2.3 is not exact, check whether it is in power form, and see whether if it can be made exact using IFM with
.
(3) Verify the following Hermite polynomials are homogenous solutions of Equation 5.2.3.
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
Part (1)
Verify Exactness of Legendre L2-ODE-VC
Condition 1:

Condition 2a:


Letting
![]() |
allows the first part of Condition 2a to be satisfied.



Thus Condition 2 (first method) is satisfied.
Condition 2b:

Thus Condition 2a (second part) is satisfied.
Verify Exactness of Bessel L2-ODE-VC
Condition 1:

Condition 2a:



Thus the Bessel equation satisfies exactness only if we assume
![]() |



Thus Condition 2a(second part) is satisfied.
Condition 2b:

Thus Condition 2a (second part) is satisfied.
Verify Exactness of Hermite L2-ODE-VC
Condition 1:

Condition 2a:


Letting
![]() |
allows the first part of Condition 2a to be satisfied.



Thus Condition 2 (first method) is satisfied.
Condition 2b:

Thus Condition 2a (second part) is satisfied.
Part (2)
Hermite differential equation

is not exact if
.
And it is in the power form of L2-ODE-VC:

with


Assuming that we can find the integrating factor which is in power form,
.Use the exactness condition to find
, such that the following N2-ODE is exact:
Rewrite Equation(5,2,1) as

Calculate the following terms in the exactness condition:







Recall the 2nd exactness condition for L2-ODE-VC:
Substituting those calculated terms into Equation(5,2,5) and Equation(5.2.6).
The 1st exactness condition Equation(5,2,5) is

The 2nd exactness conditionEquation(5.2.6) is

It is obvious that only if
, the 2nd exactness condition Equation(5.2.6) is satisfied.
Substitute
into Equation(5,2,5), we can obtain

It means

and

We choose
to make the factor h(x,y) not zero.
|
Therefore, Equation(5,2,4) can be exact using IFM with |
Part (3)
Verify the first three terms of Hermite polynomials.
Letting
![]() |



Substitute them into the Hermite differential equation Equation(5.2.3):

Therefore, the first term of Hermite polynomial
is the homogeneous solution of the Hermite differential equation Equation (5.2.3).
Letting
![]() |



Substitute them into the Hermite differential equation Equation(5.2.3):

Therefore, the second term of Hermite polynomial
is the homogeneous solution of the Hermite differential equation Equation (5.2.3).
Letting
![]() |



Substitute them into the Hermite differential equation Equation(5.2.3):

Therefore, the third term of Hermite polynomial
is the homogeneous solution of the Hermite differential equation Equation (5.2.3).
R*5.3 Find the expressions for X(x)in terms of
[edit]
Given [edit]


Assume:

characteristic equation:

then:

Find[4] [edit]
the expressions for
in terms of:

Solution [edit]
|
Solved on my own |

We can rewrite it to:

We can rewrite it to:
So, add up the two terms from equation 5.3.2 and equation 5.3.3:
Where:

R*5.4 Find
in terms of derivatives of y with respect to time [edit]
Given [5] [6] [edit]
Transformation of variables:
.The derivatives of y with respect to x are:




Find [edit]
Find
in terms of the derivatives of y with respect to t.
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
Recall that

The derivative is
|
|
R*5.5 Solving Euler's 2nd-order differential equation using the method of trial solution [edit]
Given [edit]
A second order linear ordinary differential equation with varying coefficients(L2-ODE-VC)
|
|
(5.5.1) |
With Boundary Coditions,
|
|
(5.5.2) |
Find [edit]
The solution using the method of trial solution
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
Using the given trial solution
|
|
(5.5.3) |
where r is constant. Then
|
|
(5.5.4) |
substituting (5.5.4) into (5.5.1)
|
|
(5.5.5) |
this can be simplified to,
|
|
(5.5.6) |
IN general a homogeneous solution takes the following form
|
|
(5.5.7) |
Since we have two roots 5.5.7 is written as,
|
|
(5.5.8) |
Using the given roots in 5.5.6 the general solution is
|
|
(5.5.9) |
Using the boundary conditions given in 5.5.2, we get
|
|
(5.5.10) |
These equations can be solved by simple substitution which yields c1=-11.5 and c2=7.5, therefore the solution of this BVP is
|
|
(5.5.11) |
The plot of the homogeneous solution is shown below
R5.6 Show that the trial solution in Method 2 is equivalent to the combined trial solutions in Method 1 [edit]
Given [edit]
Show the equivalence of two methods using Euler L3-ODE-VC as an example:
Find[7] [edit]
That the trial solution in Method 2 is equivalent to the combined trial solutions in Method 1.
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on my own |
1.Method I Stage 1,

and we have derived in class that:
plug equations 2,3,4 into 1, we obtain:
Rearranging:
Stage 2,

substitute into equation 5.6.6, we get:
Finally:
|
|
2.Method II

substitute into equation 1:
rearranging:
And, finally:
|
|
So, using whatever method I or method II, we can derive the exact same characteristic equation
thus, they are just the same.
R*5.7 Euler L2-ODE With Multiple Roots [edit]
Given [edit]
Characteristic Equation
Euler L2-ODE-VC
Euler L2-ODE-CC
Find[8] [edit]
(1.1) Find
so that Equation 5.7.1 is a characteristic equation of Equation 5.7.2.
(1.2) Show the 1st homogenous solution is
.
(1.3) Find
such that
.
(1.4) Find the 2nd homogenous solution
.
(2) Repeat steps 1.1 thru 1.4 for Equation 5.7.3.
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
Part 1 [edit]
Section 1 [edit]
Solve for the coefficients using the trial solution method. We shall assume the solution is in the form
where
is a constant. The following derivatives are calculated:


Substituting the above derivatives into Equation 5.7.2 yields the following:




Now we can compare the above result to the expanded characteristic equation:

A simple comparison of coefficients implies the following:
|
|
Section 2 [edit]
We assumed a form of
and the characteristic equation is
, thus
must equal
to satisfy the characteristic equation, and thus the first homogenous solution is
|
|
Section 3 [edit]
The complete solution will be the form such that

This
will be inserted into Equation 5.7.2, so lets calculate derivatives.


Entering these derivatives into Equation 5.7.2 yields:
![a_2x^2\left[c''y_1+2c'y_1'+cy_1''\right]+a_1x\left[c'y_1+cy_1'\right]+a_0\left[cy_1\right]=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/c/6/4c68646292087343eb3c66bd64acb0fc.png)
Now group by
:
![\left[a_0x^2y_1\right]c''+\left[2a_2x^2y_1'+a_1xy_1\right]c'+\left[a_2x^2y_1''+a_1xy_1'+a_0y_1\right]c=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/9/b/e9ba851d92b7ed1bd512de04cb349706.png)
Note the last set of terms will be zero by Equation 5.7.2. Then enter in the derivatives and constants and simplify.
![c''(x)\left[x^{\lambda+2}\right]+c'(x)\left[2\lambda x^{\lambda+1}+\left(1-2\lambda\right)x^{\lambda+1}\right]=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/4/8/54854affffb879450bbc73ef4c4a8739.png)

![\displaystyle \left[c''(x)x+c'(x)\right]x^{\lambda+1}=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/0/8/70812f444464571713703ae292b7ff67.png)

This is a fairly straighforward ODE:




Therefore it is clear that
|
|
Section 4 [edit]
We have found the complete solution
in the previous section. We know this complete solution is equivalent to the linear combination of two homogeneous solutions:

Thus it is a matter of comparing the two equations to extract the 2nd homogeneous solution
. From Section 3 it is true that

Knowing that
it can be deduced that
|
|
Part 2 [edit]
Section 1 [edit]
The coefficients of 5.7.3 can be found by using the trial solution method. The given trial solution for the Euler equation with constant coefficient is:
|
|
The derivatives are calculated:
|
|
|
|
Substituting the above derivatives into Equation 5.7.3 we get:
|
|
|
|
Now we can cancel out 
|
|
Comparing the above equation to the characteristic equation given in 5.7.3 we have:
|
|
By comparing the coefficients of both sides of the above equation we get:
|
|
Section 2 [edit]
From the Part 2 Section 1, the characteristic equation of 5.7.3 is 5.7.1. There are two identical roots of equation 5.7.1 equal to
. The 1st homogeneous solution can be calculated by:
|
|
|
|
Section 3 [edit]
The complete solution will be of the form such that:
|
|
This
will be inserted into Equation 5.7.3, so lets calculate derivatives.
|
|
|
|
Entering these derivatives into Equation 5.7.3 yields:
|
|
Now group by
terms:
|
|
Note that the first term with
will be zero by equation 5.7.3, then enter the derivatives and constants and simplify:
|
|
|
|
In order for this to be zero the following must be true:
|
|
Integrating both sides of the above we have:
|
|
Integrating the above we have c(x) as:
|
|
Finally, using the above equation and the 1st homogeneous solution from part 2 section 2 substituted into the form of the 2nd homogeneous solution stated above yields the 2nd homogeneous solution:
|
|
Section 4 [edit]
The generalized homogeneous solution takes the following form:
|
|
Substituting the 1st and 2nd homogeneous solution into the general form above yields:
|
|
|
|
|
|
with


Substituting these constants yields the generalized homogeneous solution:
|
|
R*5.8 [edit]
Question from meeting 32, page 32-2:
Given: recall p. 12-2, R*2.17


Find: use the same idea of variation of constants (parameters) to find the particular solution
after knowing the homogeneous solution
, i.e., let y(x) = A(x)
, with A(x) being the unknown to be found.
From lecture notes Mtg 32
Solution [edit]
|
Solved on our own |
The key is to start with equation (3) on p. 11-3 below.


The equation is an L1-ODE-VC. Note that the non-homogeneous equation above utilizes the following integration factor for the solution of y. But we must find the homogenous counterpart to this solution
![y(x) = \frac{1}{h(x)} \left[\int^x h(s)b(s)ds + k_2 \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/d/7/ed7dbce6d265c3dfc939c94d8a214304.png)

The homogeneous solution of the L1-ODE-VC was derived in R2.17 by team 1. The solution summary is repeated for clarity. Note that team 1 has already submitted this solution for R2.17 back in Report 2. The steps are from a simple cross-reference used to define the homogeneous solution of 5.8.2


Integration of both sides of this equation gives


Solving for
gives
![y_H= \exp\left[ -\int^{x} {a}_{0} \left( s\right)ds + C \right]= A\exp\left[ -\int^{x} {a}_{0} \left( s\right)ds\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/c/f/ccf13773addeeeaf3623f3db669f3536.png)
Now, the homogenous solution is known from 2.17. The next step is to find the complete solution for the homogenous equation-
. The technique demonstrated in the lecture is to substitute the chosen form of y(x) into the original Euler equation to find the complete solution below. This is a classic application of the variation of parameters: (1) find homogenous solution, (2) find complete solution of Euler form - the L1-ODE-VC, and (3) find the particular solution by using (1) and (2).


The derivative simplifies the Euler equation. First, it must be derived.


The values can be substituted into the L1-ODE-VC to give the form below.

The equation can be rerranged to give a simple form for integration by natural logarithms and subsequent exponentiation for the complete solution of the L1-ODE-VC.


The rearranged equation can be integrated by standard application of natural logarithms.

Use the identity for logarithms:
, which gives
.
The equation then gives the next output form.


The final complete solution is y(x) = A(x)
, which gives


The particular solution is simply found by substration the homogenous solution from the complete solution.


Part 2 [edit]
References [edit]
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 22-23 6 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 16 22 Sept 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 27 20 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 30 29 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 30 25 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 31 25 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 31 29 Oct 2011
- ↑ Vu-Quoc, L. Class Lecture: Principles of Engineering Analysis. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Meeting 32 27 Oct 2011
Team Work Distribution [edit]
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


































in terms of derivatives of y with respect to time
![\displaystyle =\frac{d}{dt}\left[e^{(-4t)}\,(y_{tttt}-6y_{ttt}+11y_{tt}-6y_t)\right]\cdot e^{-t}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/c/c/dcc16e9f7f46d45490887e7a7236b5e2.png)
![\displaystyle =e^{-t}\cdot\left[\frac{d}{dt}(e^{-4t}\cdot(y_{tttt}-6y_{ttt}+11y_{tt}-6y_t)+e^{-4t}\cdot \frac{d}{dt} (y_{tttt}-6y_{ttt}+11y_{tt}-6y_t)\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/a/a/1aa113414e6381bb7091331880e2dd07.png)





,










































![\begin{align} \left[ {{b}_{2}}{{r}^{2}}+{{b}_{1}}r+{{b}_{0}} \right]{{e}^{xr}}=0 \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/8/3/c833d20537db30aa16da00c6bca5081e.png)






![\begin{align} {{b}_{2}}\left[ c''\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)+2c'\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}'\left( x \right)+c\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}''\left( x \right) \right]+{{b}_{1}}\left[ c'\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)+c\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}'\left( x \right) \right]+{{b}_{0}}c\left( x \right)\cdot {{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)=0 \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/2/a/d2a26dfd5184a4f60fc0c7ff932cacd5.png)
![\begin{align} c\left( x \right)\left[ {{{b}_{2}}{{y}_{1}}''\left( x \right)+{{b}_{1}}{{y}_{1}}'\left( x \right)+{{b}_{0}}{{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)}\right]+c'\left( x \right)\left[ 2{{b}_{2}}{{y}_{1}}'\left( x \right)+{{b}_{1}}{{y}_{1}}\left( x \right) \right]+c''\left( x \right)\cdot {{b}_{2}}{{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)=0 \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/0/4/20401a7ecd9c96500b4cb1ae59f04059.png)
![\begin{align} c'\left( x \right)\left[ 2{{b}_{2}}{{y}_{1}}'\left( x \right)+{{b}_{1}}{{y}_{1}}\left( x \right) \right]+c''\left( x \right)\cdot {{b}_{2}}{{y}_{1}}\left( x \right)=0 \end{align}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/4/3/2/432eb5ad067dbe327c8316bd35c549b3.png)








after knowing the homogeneous solution
, i.e., let y(x) = A(x)
, with A(x) being the unknown to be found.