User:Egm6321.f10.team03/Hwk3
Problem 1 - Motion of a Projectile with Air Resistance [edit]
Given [edit]
Figure shows the Trajectory of a projectile (ex:Rocket):
|
|
Find [edit]
Drive Equation of Motion (EOM)
Particular case
: Verify
is parabolla
Consider
,
,
Find
,
for
= constant
Find
,
if 
Solution [edit]
Part 1
Consider the trajectory of a projectile (ex. Rocket)
- Various forces acting on the projectile at time 't' are:
- 1) Weight of the projectile
- 2) Inertia force
-
for particle with constant mass
- 3) Air resistance which is proportional to the velocity of particle
Now consider the force equilibrium in both horizontal and vertical direction
- a) Force Equilibrium in horizontal direction:
,
- where
horizontal component of velocity
- where
- b) Force Equilibrium in the vertical direction:
,
- where
vertical component of velocity
- where
Part 2
- Particular case: When

Eq.1.1 reduces to
Integrating the above equation gives:
Apply 'initial condition' to determine integration constant,
Now Eq.1.3 becomes:
Integrate the above equation to obtain ,
Then 'Initial condition' is applied to determine ,
Therefore,
Now
, can be expressed in terms of
,
Similarly When
, Eq.1.2 reduces to
Integrate the above equation to evaluate, 
Apply 'initial condition' to obtain 
Now Eq.1.5 becomes,
Then integrate the above equation to determine, 
is determined using 'initial condition' as:
Therefore,
Now Substitute Eq.1.4 for
in the above equation;
Eq.1.6 is in the form of a parabolic equation. Therefore
is parabola.
Part 3
Part 3.1: Constant mass,
Then
Or

- Let
Therefore
And equation 1.7.2 can be written in the form
Where
and
Check the exactness of equation 1.7.4. First condition is satisfied as it is in the form
Second condition is satisfied if
Differentiating:
and
Therefore equation 1.7.4 is not exact and must be made exact by finding an integration factor 
Choose an integrating factor as a function of time only
Therefore
and
Rearranging and substituting
Integrate equation 1.7.14 to get the integrating factor,
. Multiply equation 1.7.2 by this gives us the exact form
Therefore
To test this solution, assume
. Equation 1.7.16 then becomes
Plug in initial conditions of
, and
to obtain
. Equation 1.7.17 becomes
Integrate equation 1.7.18 to obtain
Plug in initial conditions of
, and
to obtain . Equation 1.7.19 becomes
Since equations 1.7.18 and 1.7.20 agree with common solutions found in undergraduate mechanics, the general case can be stated after introducing dummy variables
, and 
and
Part 3.2 Find
and
for
To solve we first apply a force balance on the rocket
Use the conservation of linear momentum
Plugging equation 1.8.2 into 1.8.1
Since the mass is reduced at a constant rate while the fuel is burned for
the rate in equation 1.8.3 becomes a constant
And equation 1.8.3 becomes
Rearranging gives us
Check for exactness. Equation 1.8.6 is in the form to satisfy condition 1. Checking condition 2
Second condition is not satisfied. Make equation 1.8.6 exact using an integrating factor
Choose an integrating factor as a function of time only, such that
and therefore
Plugging in
Integrating, using a dummy variable 
Therefore
Using a dummy variable
, a solution can be written as
and
With varying mass and air resistance, the equations are typically solved by numerical methods.
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved and posted part 1 & part 2 by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 15:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proofread part 1 & 2 and posted part 3 by James Roark 19:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Solved part 3 by Chris Cook --Egm6321.f10.team3.cook 22:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 2- Equation of Motion of Pendulums Connected by a Spring [edit]
Given [edit]
Shown in figure are the two Pendulums connected by a spring:
|
|
Find [edit]
Derive equation of motion:
Write Eq.2.1 and Eq.2.2 in the form of Mtg 13 (c),page2 , of:
-
Given
and ![\underset{-}{\mathop{u}}\,={{\left[ \begin{matrix}
{{u}_{1}}l & {{u}_{2}}l \\
\end{matrix} \right]}^{T}}](//upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/2/2/c221caf3dff4ad2a1b275f6dc2355ba3.png)
Solution [edit]
Derive equation of motion:- (a) Consider Free Body Diagram of left pendulum:
- For small angle:
-
and 
Now using D'Alembert's_principle, sum of the moments about pivot(A)is equal to zero
- (b) Consider Free Body Diagram of right pendulum:
- For small angle:
-
and 
Using D'Alembert's_principle, sum of the moments about pivot(B)is equal to zero
Write Eq.2.1 and Eq.2.2 in the form of Eq.2.3(system of coupled equation):
- Eq.2.1 can be rearranged as,
- Now Eq.2.4 and Eq.2.5 can be put in the form of Eq.2.3 as:
- Where:
Contributing Members [edit]
Solved and posted by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 15:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Proofed by Kurt Schulze
Proofed by Egm6321.f10.team3.franklin 06:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 3- Solution of State Equation (Control Engineering) [edit]
Given [edit]
Find [edit]
Solve given equation by using Integrating Factor Method.
Solution [edit]
Let a(t) = a & b(t) = b
We determine integrating factor from the coefficient of x(t) in Eq(3.1)
Apply obtained integrating factor to Eq(3.1)
Integrate between
<
< 
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved and posted by-User:Egm6321.f10.team3.Hong SJ 21:18, 03 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by- Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 00:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by-Egm6321.f10.team03.sigillo 13:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 4: Expansion of a Taylor Series [edit]
Given [edit]
Given an expression of 
Find [edit]
Find the Taylor Series Expansion
Solution [edit]
In general, the Taylor Series can be defined as:
Where
is the
th derivative of
evaluated at
. Expanding the series around point
gives each
th derivative of
equal to zero, or
. Thus, the Taylor series in this case can be defined as:
Hence, for
, Taylor's series expansion is
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved and posted by James Roark 23:02, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 00:36, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read byEgm6321.f10.team03.sigillo 14:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read byEgm6321.f10.team03.Hong SJ 11:24, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.franklin 05:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 5 - Generalization of a SC-L1-ODE-CC to SC-L1-ODE-VC [edit]
Given [edit]
Given is the solution for
of a first order linear ODE for a coupled system with constant coefficients (SC-L1-ODE-CC) out of the lecture notes in Mtg 14 page 1-2, Eq.4:
Where
is a n x 1 vector,
a m x 1 vector,
is a n x n matrix and
is a n x m matrix.
Find [edit]
The general form for SC-L1-ODEs with varying coefficient (SC-L1-ODE-VC) has to be found based on the given SC-L1-ODE-CC
Solution [edit]
Following the approach of the integrating factor method and comparing the general form for L1-ODE-VC given in Eq.3,page 1, Mtg 14 , it can be seen (and calculated through the intergration factor method - refer to Problem 3-) that the generalized form for (Eq. 5.1) can be achieved by integrating the argument of the exp(.)-function in the limits
and
for the first term,
and
for the second term:
Note: The integral of a matrix is calculated by integrating each element that composes the matrix.
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved by Michele Sigilló
- Posted by Michele Sigilló
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 18:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 6 - General SC-L1-ODE-CC with state transition matrix
[edit]
Given [edit]
The state equation for a coupled system like it's usual for a openloop control system is given as:
The state transition matrix
has the following properties:
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
where I is the identity matrix.
Find [edit]
With (Eq. 6.1) through (Eq. 6.3), Eq. (4) on pp. 14-1 of the lecture notes, has to be found:
Solution [edit]
In (Eq. 6.2) the homogeneous differential equation for
is given. Thus replacing
with
in (Eq. 6.1) gives the inhomogeneous equation for
:
Regrouping the equation above results in:
(Eq. 6.6) meets the first condition of exactness, but the second condition
needs to be checked:
The second condition is not met, thus a function
to make (Eq. 6.6) exact needs to be found. Therefore (Eq. 6.6) will be rewritten as:
The integrating factor
is then given as:
Multiplying
throughout (Eq. 6.8) gives:
which is equal to
Integrating (Eq. 6.11) on both sides between
and
gives:
that is equal to
Replacing
with
gives:
which is the same as the given solution in (Eq. 6.4)!
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved by Michele Sigilló
- Posted by Michele Sigilló
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.franklin 06:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by James Roark 12:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 7 - Roll Control of Rocket By Actuating Ailerons [edit]
Given [edit]
|
|
Find [edit]
Control behavior in form of
Solution [edit]
- Integrating Eq.7.3 gives,
- Substitute Eq.7.5 for
, in Eq.7.2:
- Now integrate Eq.7.6:
- Similarly integrating Eq.7.1 gives,
- Substitute Eq.7.8 in Eq.7.7 implies,
- From Eq.7.1 and Eq.7.9,
- Now, Eq.7.3, Eq.7.6 and Eq.7.10 can be written in the required form as,
- where,
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved by: Egm6321.f10.team03 19:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC).Kurt Schulze
- Posted by: Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 18:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team03.sigillo 14:30, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.franklin 05:58, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 8- Discuss the search for h [edit]
Given [edit]
From the lecture notes of Mtg [17]
Find [edit]
Without assuming a priory that
, discuss the search for the solution of 
Solution [edit]
To find
we begin by rearranging
to find
Next we will use the property that
and see if it holds. First we take evaluate 
By inserting
into
we see that this property does not hold
So for
to be true,
.
Therefore 
Contributing Members [edit]
Solved and Posted By Chris Cook --Egm6321.f10.team3.cook 22:08, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 9 - Check Exactness of Differential Equation [edit]
Given [edit]
Find [edit]
Solution [edit]
Apply obtained factors to Eq(9.1)
Apply obtained factors to Eq(9.2)
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved and posted by-User:Egm6321.f10.team3.Hong SJ 17:09, 04 October 2010 (UTC)
- Proof read by Kurt Schulze
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 18:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Problem 10 - Generate exact N2-ODE's - Reverse Engineering [edit]
Given [edit]
Given is the following function from meeting 17
and Eq. (2) from meeting 17
on page 17-1 and 17-3 respectively in the lecture notes.
Find [edit]
Using (Eq. 10.2) the function
has to be found in order to get again the given function
(reverse engineering) assuming
.
Solution [edit]
Applying the 'separation of variables'-method to the given assumption,
can be calculated:
Take derivative of
with respect to
gives:
At the same time it can be seen from (Eq. 10.2) that
is equal to
, so that the following is valid:
What implies that:
and
We know from Eq. (1) of page 17-3 in meeting 17
For the given problem,
from page 17-3 meeting 17
Now, inserting the found experssion in (Eq. 10.5) with
into Eq. 10.10 gives:
Which is the same as the given function 
Contributing Members [edit]
- Solved by Michele Sigilló
- Posted by Michele Sigilló
- Proof read by Egm6321.f10.team3.Sudheesh 18:14, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Contributing Team Members [edit]
- Kurt Schulze, solved 7, proofed 2 and 9.
- Michele Sigilló, solved 5,6,10, proofed 3,4,7.
- Sung Joo, Hong, solved 3, 9, proofed 4.
- Sudheesh Thiyyakkandi, Solved and posted 1(part1& part2), 2, Posted 7, proofed 3,4,5,9,10.
- Adam Franklin, proofed 2, 4, 6, and 7.


Drive Equation of Motion (EOM)
Particular case
is parabolla
Consider
,
Find
,
for
= constant
Find 
for particle with constant mass

,
horizontal component of velocity


,
vertical component of velocity









































![h \left(t,v \right) \left[m \dot{v}+k {v}^{n}+mg\right]=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/f/3/3f3d45a278205b8348d815bde0ed6f8e.png)





![\frac{1}{h}dh= -\frac{1}{m} \left[0-kn {v}^{n-1} \right]dt](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/5/7/b576d5f37b3223e7261335feb51b3a02.png)

![F=exp \left( \frac{kn {v}^{n-1}}{m}t\right)v'+exp \left( \frac{kn {v}^{n-1}}{m}t\right) \left[ \frac{k}{m} {v}^{n}+g\right]=0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/4/f/a4fd3534197d7ebebdbb34474777118b.png)



![{v}_{y} \left(t \right)= exp \left(- \frac{k}{m}t \right) \left[- \frac{mg}{k}exp \left( \frac{k}{m}t \right)+c \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/d/e/2de030f6e193f75965e4dbac39852b60.png)





![{c}_{2}= {y}_{0}- \frac{mg}{k}+ \frac{m}{k} \left( {v}_{ {y}_{0}}+ \frac{mg}{k}\right) \left[1-exp( \frac{k}{m}t \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/3/0/630d109754af4372aa1989da25843e2b.png)























![\frac{{h}_{t}}{h}= \frac{-1}{1} \left[0- \frac{kn{ {v}_{y}}^{n-1}}{m \left(t \right)}+ \frac{ \alpha}{m \left(t \right)} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/7/4/8748c23b4c5db2691a5b0e96bac211c3.png)



![h= exp \left[ \int_{}^{t} \left( \frac{kn{ {v}_{y} \left(s \right)}^{n-1}}{m \left(s \right)}+ \frac{ \alpha}{m \left(s \right)}\right)ds\right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/6/6/b66e1b2c6fad1212879ec790acc4e6e7.png)

![{v}_{y} \left(t \right)= exp \left[ -\int_{}^{t} \left( \frac{kn{ {v}_{y} \left(s \right)}^{n-1}}{m \left(s \right)}+ \frac{ \alpha}{m \left(s \right)}\right)ds\right] \int_{}^{t} exp \left[ \int_{}^{s} \left( \frac{kn{ {v}_{y} \left(w \right)}^{n-1}}{m \left(w \right)}+ \frac{ \alpha}{m \left(w \right)}\right)dw\right]gds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/6/9/a/69a8b01f0c11eea572e2874d9994d276.png)










and ![\underset{-}{\mathop{u}}\,={{\left[ \begin{matrix}
{{u}_{1}}l & {{u}_{2}}l \\
\end{matrix} \right]}^{T}}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/2/2/c221caf3dff4ad2a1b275f6dc2355ba3.png)
and 





and 









![\left[ \begin{matrix}
{{\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{1}} \\
{{\overset{\centerdot \centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{1}} \\
{{\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{2}} \\
{{\overset{\centerdot \centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{2}} \\
\end{matrix} \right]=\underbrace{\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
\frac{-\left( k{{a}^{2}}+{{m}_{1}}gl \right)}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 & \frac{k{{a}^{2}}}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
\frac{k{{a}^{2}}}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 & \frac{-\left( k{{a}^{2}}+{{m}_{2}}gl \right)}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right]}_{\underset{-}{\mathop{A}}\,}\left[ \begin{matrix}
{{\theta }_{1}} \\
{{\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{1}} \\
{{\theta }_{2}} \\
{{\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\theta }}\,}_{2}} \\
\end{matrix} \right]+\underbrace{\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 0 \\
\frac{1}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{1}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} \\
\end{matrix} \right]}_{\underset{-}{\mathop{B}}\,}\left[ \begin{matrix}
{{u}_{1}}l \\
{{u}_{2}}l \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/b/b/0bb9f0a12b347c9cb93e970b41d60977.png)

![\underset{-}{\mathop{A}}\,=\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
\frac{-\left( k{{a}^{2}}+{{m}_{1}}gl \right)}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 & \frac{k{{a}^{2}}}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
\frac{k{{a}^{2}}}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 & \frac{-\left( k{{a}^{2}}+{{m}_{2}}gl \right)}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/9/9/899f1daa370d21ce94078acf1e34f004.png)
![\underset{-}{\mathop{B}}\,=\left[ \begin{matrix}
0 & 0 \\
\frac{1}{m{}_{1}{{l}^{2}}} & 0 \\
0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{1}{m{}_{2}{{l}^{2}}} \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/d/4/dd4788ecb6c5b75e08a717b2b6cad708.png)






![[x'(t)-a\cdot x(t)]\cdot e^{-at} = [b\cdot u(t)]\cdot e^{-at}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/9/9/e9953850d210b3152e190d5ca3915a55.png)

![[e^{-at}\cdot x(t)]' = b\cdot u(t)\cdot e^{-at}](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/b/e/4/be4f90c26bf44d9d3d51ed3e5936b27c.png)
![\int\limits_{{{t}_{0}}}^{t}{[e^{-a\tau}\cdot x(\tau)]'}d\tau = \int\limits_{{{t}_{0}}}^{t} {b \cdot u(\tau)\cdot e^{-a\tau}}d\tau](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/5/4/954eb2b7afec69d3ad9ee8beaadc2746.png)





















































, in Eq.7.2:









![\left[ \begin{matrix}
\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\phi }}\, \\
\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\omega }}\, \\
\overset{\centerdot }{\mathop{\delta }}\, \\
\end{matrix} \right]=\left[ \begin{matrix}
\frac{-1}{\tau } & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-1}{\tau } & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right]\left[ \begin{matrix}
\phi \\
\omega \\
\delta \\
\end{matrix} \right]+\left[ \begin{matrix}
\frac{Q{{t}^{2}}}{2\tau } \\
\frac{Qt}{\tau } \\
1 \\
\end{matrix} \right]\left[ u \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/a/0/5a0a655b9ceeea3efbe4861938d9bd4f.png)

![\underset{-}{\mathop{A}}\,=\left[ \begin{matrix}
\frac{-1}{\tau } & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \frac{-1}{\tau } & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/0/a/a0aa06a9d21353d735bdbbe43a3ef4bc.png)
![\underset{-}{\mathop{B}}\,=\left[ \begin{matrix}
\frac{Q{{t}^{2}}}{2\tau } \\
\frac{Qt}{\tau } \\
1 \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/f/1/0f12e0e59d16f9ddf5092445419a0738.png)
![\underset{-}{\mathop{x}}\,=\left[ \begin{matrix}
\phi \\
\omega \\
\delta \\
\end{matrix} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/b/0/7b0686113af91bb1b3c0c3d0f2481d2d.png)
![\underset{-}{\mathop{u}}\,=\left[ u \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/d/b/adb125f801a695925d808fb22ea044d3.png)




































































from page 17-3 