User:Egm6321.f09.team5/HW3
Contents |
Problem 1 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Find
such that
is exact.
Solution [edit]
The first step is to identify what kind of ODE is the given equation. It is identified as a Non-Linear Second-Order ODE (N2.ODE). In order for a second order ODE to be exact the following two conditions must be met:
Condition 1: The ODE must be of the form:
Equation 1
Where 
You are mixing upper and lowercase letters for
in your partial expressions and exactness criteria, which is generally treacherous ground. Some of your expressions below mix upper/lowercase in the same equation. Recall that on p.13-2 we defined
and
. You want to be consistent in your notation. --Egm6321.f09.TA 04:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Condition 2: The following Conditions must be met:
Equation 2
Equation 3
By arranging the given equation so it satisfies the first exactness condition (Equation 1) The Following is obtained
Where
In order to meet the Second Condition for exactness the following partial derivatives must be identified:






By populating equation 3, the following is obtained:

Therefore
Using the value for n and populating Equation 2, the following is found:

Rearranging: 

In order for this equation to be satisfied, both sides of the equation must be equal to 0 :


The exact ODE is:
You can leave out
terms in the expression for the exact ODE. --Egm6321.f09.TA 04:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 2 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
where
are constants.
Solve for
Hint: L1.ODE.VC (int. Factor Method)
Solution [edit]
The First step is to test the equation for exactness:
The two conditions for exactness of a L1.ODE.VC are:
The ODE must be of the form:
The Second Condition is:
Applying our equation to the condition test we find that the equation is not exact as follows:




In order to find y(x) we must then use Euler's Integration Factor Method as Follows:
An integration factor h is identified and used as follows:
Equation 1
At this point we will consider the particular case when the integration factor is only a function of x.

With this definition Equation 1, becomes:

Which can then be re-arranged as follows:

Substituting the known values into this relation we obtain:

Using this expression an integration factor is found as follows:



This integrating factor is not correct. Egm6321.f09.TA 01:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Using the newly identified integration factor the following can be defined:
The Original Equation can be re-written as:
A solution for an equation in this form can be identified as follows:
By populating the previous equation with our known values the following is obtained:
![y(x) = \frac{1}{x^{2}-\exp(\frac{4x^{\frac{3}{2}}}{3})} \int{}^{x} \left[ s^{2} - exp(\frac{4s^{\frac{3}{2}}}{3}) \right] (K_{2}-K_{1})ds](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/7/6/c/76c4aaa6504f5c85444f0e6a314ae1f5.png)
Your
produces an incorrect result. If you don't verify exactness (as a double check on the integrating factor) then you have to be extra careful when using the result. Egm6321.f09.TA 01:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 3 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Find the mathematical structure of
that will yield L2.ODE.VC
Solution [edit]
First it is necessary to define the first integral as follows:

Equation 1
Why did you change
to
? Egm6321.f09.TA 02:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
The next step is to define a 2nd Order ODE as follows:
Equation 2
Comparing Equation 2 with Equation 1 the following is identified:



Why are you introducing
into your notation? Egm6321.f09.TA 02:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
The next step is to integrate as follows:



Adding all the definition for Phi the following is obtained:
Equation 3
In order to generate additional exact L2.ODE.VC, the first integral,
, must be of the form outlined in Equation 3.
This does not quite match the expected form. Egm6321.f09.TA 02:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 4 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 4 From (p.13-3), for the case
(N1_ODE)
.
Show that
.
Hint: Use
.
Specifically:
4.1) Find
in terms of 
4.2) Find
in terms of
(
)
4.3) Show that
.
Solution [edit]
Note: 
For n=1, 

4.1)

. You are missing terms. The differential with respect to y should be a partial. --Egm6321.f09.TA 14:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
4.2}

4.3)



. --Egm6321.f09.TA 14:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 5 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 5 From (p.13-3), for the case
(N2_ODE) show:
5.1) Show 
5.2) Show 
5.3) 
5.4) Relate eqn. 5 to eqs. 4&5 from p.10-2.
Solution [edit]
Note: 
For n=2, 

-> partial wrt to y, not total derivative. --Egm6321.f09.TA 01:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
5.1)


This expression for
is not correct. --Egm6321.f09.TA 01:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
5.2}

Your partial differentiations are incorrect. The correct expression was obtained by complimentary errors. --Egm6321.f09.TA 01:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
5.3)



I am not sure how you arrived at this result. It is not clear what you have done. --Egm6321.f09.TA 01:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
5.4)
Equation (4) from 10-2:

Equation (5) from 10-2:



Find
using 



Plug into 


Which can be simplified down to:
The previous equation is valid if the following equations are satisfied:
good work. --Egm6321.f09.TA 01:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 6 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 6 From (p.14-2), for the Legendre differential equation
,
6.1 Verify exactness of this equation using two methods:
6.1a.) (p.10-2), Equations 4&5.
6.1b.) (p.14-1), Equation 5.
6.2 If it is not exact, see whether it can be made exact using the integrating factor with
.
Solution [edit]
6.1a)
Equation (4) from 10-2:

Equation (5) from 10-2:

The Legendre differential equation has the form:

so:

and

To use equation (4) and (5), we must find all the partial derivatives:













Plugging these derivatives into equations (4) and (5) we get:
Which is not exact, (unless n equals 0 or -1).
Which is exact.
We can't show exactness because equation (4) fail to show exactness.
6.1b)
For an alternate method of finding exactness we can use equation (5) from page 14-1:




Plugging these into equation (5) we get:


The exactness condition still isn't satisfied, but it could be if n were to equal 0 or -1.
6.2)
Make
an exact equation by using an integrating factor of the form 

Equation 1
Equation 2
Using Equations 1 and 2 we check the for exactness of the function F multiplied by the integrating factor. Equation 2 yields:

Therefore n = 0.
Populating Equation 1 with n=0 yields.

Which can be rearranged to produce:

Both sides of the equation must equal zero, therefore

The exact ODE is:
Problem 7 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 7 From (p.14-3), Show that equations 1 and 2, namely
7.1
functions of
,
. and
7.2
functions of
.
are equivalent to equation 3 on p.3-3.
Solution [edit]
Use:
and 
to show that:

Using the additive property we can show that:

If α and β are equal to 1, this would give us the additive equation:

Using the multiplicative property we can state that:

and

If both α and β are equal to λ, the multiplicative property is apparent as both equations take the form of the multiplicative equation:

Putting all of this together, the additive and multiplicative properties show that:
good explanation, although you do not need to choose values for
. --Egm6321.f09.TA 04:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 8 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 8 From (p.15-2), plot the shape function
.
Solution [edit]
correct. Egm6321.f09.TA 03:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 9 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Problem 9 From (p.16-2), show that


Solution [edit]










It is not clear from your expressions which terms your differential operators are acting upon. You need some parenthesis or brackets (or alternate expressions) to clarify this. Egm6321.f09.TA 03:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 10 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Solve:
Equation 1
using the method of trial solution
directly for the boundary conditions 
Compare the solution with equation 10 on p.16-3. Use matlab to plot the solutions.
Solution [edit]
Given that the solution to this ODE is of the form:
Equation 2
PART 1
Since the trial solution is:

The following can be determined:


Using these results and using them in Equation 1, the following is obtained:

Simplify to find:

This previous result is the characteristic equation of the ODE. The next step is to find the roots "r".

With these roots and comparing to Equation 2, the following is the particular solution:

The constants (C1 and C2) can be then found using the known values of the function y(x):
since: 
Equation 3.
Equation 4.
Solving Equations 3 and 4 simultaneously it yields:

Then the solution is of the form:
Equation 5
The Plot of the Solution is shown in Figure 1.
| Description |
Graph of the Solution using Matlab |
|---|---|
| Source | |
| Date |
10/7/09 |
| Author |
G.V |
| Permission |
G.V |
very good. Egm6321.f09.TA 03:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
PART 2
Since the trial solution is:

The following can be determined:


Using these results and using them in Equation 1, the following is obtained:

Simplify to find:

The previous equation cannot be solved without additional information therefore it is assumed to be a bad guess for a solution.
By Using the values for the roots as found in the previous part, the Equation becomes of the form:

Using the known values for y(x) the constants are found as follows:

It then follows that the solution is of the form:
The plot of the solution is shown in Figure 2: File:Noow.jpg
| Description |
Graph of the Solution using Matlab |
|---|---|
| Source | |
| Date |
10/7/09 |
| Author |
G.V |
| Permission |
G.V |
Problem 11 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Prolbem 11 From (p.17-4 ) obtain equation 2 from p.17-3

using the integrator factor method and equation (1) from page 17-3.

Solution [edit]

Divide by u_1(x) to get:

Multiply by an integrating factor h(x):


We can say that:

thus

After some algebraic manipulation of equation (1) multiplied by h(x):


Integrating both sides we get:


We can combine the constants d, e, and 1 into another constant b:


We've already stated that:

which is the same as:

Integrating both side we get:

Plugging in h(x) into this we get:

solving for Z(x) we get:

Which can be expressed as:
very good. long but straight forward. Egm6321.f09.TA 04:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 12 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Develop reductions of order method 2 using different algebraic Operations:
1)
2)
3) 
Objective: Proof you will not obtain a solution with a missing dependent variable.
Solution [edit]
The form of a homogeneous L2.ODE.VC is as follows:
Equation 1.
1a)



Substituting into Equation 1

Rearranging yields:

Realizing that the Blue and the Red Part of the previous equations are homogeneous solutions we realize that we cannot reach a form of Equation 1, with a missing dependent Variable.
1b)



Substituting into Equation 1

Rearranging yields:

Realizing that the Blue and the Red Part of the previous equations are homogeneous solutions we realize that we cannot reach a form of Equation 1, with a missing dependent Variable.
2)


![y^{''} = \frac{u_{1}U^{''} - U^{'}u_{1}^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} - \left[ U(\frac{u_{1}^2u_{1}^{''} - u_{1}^{'}(u_{1}^{2})^{'}}{u_{1}^{4}} + \frac {u_{1}U^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/3/1/1/3111b459e2882f9669e9dd0505185490.png)
Substituting into Equation 1:
![\frac{u_{1}U^{''} - U^{'}u_{1}^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} - \left[ U(\frac{u_{1}^2u_{1}^{''} - u_{1}^{'}(u_{1}^{2})^{'}}{u_{1}^{4}} + \frac {u_{1}U^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} \right] + \frac{a_{1}U^{'}}{u_{1}} - a_{1}\frac{Uu_{1}^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} + a_{0} \left[ \frac{Uu_{1}^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} - \frac{Uu_{1}^{'}}{u_{1}^{2}} \right]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/b/5/ab5f53834be5a50cf70dc0e76c453373.png)
From the previous expression it can be seen that an expression with a missing dependent variable is not obtained.
3)
This expression is similar to part 2 and the conclusion is that an expression with a missing dependent variable cannot be obtained.
very good. Egm6321.f09.TA 04:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Problem 13 [edit]
Problem Statement [edit]
Find
and
of
Equation 1
using trial solutions:
1)
where a,b are coefficients to be determined.
2) 
Compare the two solutions using the boundary conditions:

and also compare to the solutions by reduction of order method 2. Plot Solutions using Matlab
Solution [edit]
A solution to the 2nd Order ODE would be of the following form:
Equation 2
PART 1
A trial solution will be used as follows:

"a" and "b" are coefficients to be determined using initial conditions.
using the trial solution the following is identified:


Replacing the newly defined equations into equation 1, the following is obtained:
![(1-x^{2}) \left[ (ab^{2} -ab)x^{b-2}) \right] -2x \left[abx^{b-1} \right] + 2 \left[ax^{b}\right] = 0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/c/f/e/cfe761b601d384913b51c092dd4596b6.png)
Dividing by
:
![(1-x^{2})(ab^{2}-ab)x^{-2} - 2x \left[ abx^{-1} \right] + 2a = 0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/2/f/0/2f0dff0d8c607ce105de87ec3a4bd99f.png)
Rearranging:

Dividing by "a":

From here we can then identify the following:


The next step is to identify the coefficient "b". If for both solutions known the value is computed to be the same then the trial solution is determined to be a solution to the ODE.
Since

Applying this to Equation 2 with our identified values:

The coefficient b cannot be identified as the first part of the equation yields to an undefined solution.
When




The Coefficient "b" is then identified. It is concluded that this trial solution is not a solution to the ODE.
PART 2
A trial solution will be used as follows:

"r" is a coefficient which represents the roots of the ODE's Characteristic Equation.
using the trial solution the following is identified:


Replacing the newly defined equations into equation 1, the following is obtained:
![(1-x^{2}) \left[ (r^{2}\exp^{rx}) \right] -2x \left[ r\exp^{rx} \right] + 2 \left[\exp^{rx}\right] = 0](http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/0/b/10b0ae50eef4f6cfeab3294e4865a2eb.png)
Dividing by 

Rearranging:

From here we can then identify the following:


The next step is to identify the coefficient "r". If for both solutions known the value is computed to be the same then the trial solution is determined to be a solution to the ODE.
Since

Applying this to Equation 2 with our identified values:



When




Since the solutions for "r" do not match then the Trial Solution is not a solution to the ODE.
You should be able to make one of these trials work. Egm6321.f09.TA 05:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Contributing Authors [edit]
--Egm6321.f09.team5.GV 04:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
--Egm6321.f09.team5.risher 16:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
--Egm6321.f09.team5.bear 18:15, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Equation 1
Equation 2
Equation 3
Equation 1
Equation 1
Equation 2
Equation 3
Equation 1
Equation 2
Equation 5
Equation 1.
Equation 1
Equation 2