User:Eas4200c.f08.gator.edwards/ Wk5 Class Notes

From Wikiversity
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Kinematic Assumptions [edit]

4 zero strain components

4 zero stress components

Rewrite \ \epsilon -\sigma\ relationship

\left\{\epsilon_{ij} \right\}=\begin{bmatrix}
\textbf A &0\\ 
 0& \textbf{B}
\end{bmatrix}\left\{\sigma_{ij} \right\}

\left\{\sigma_{ij} \right\}=\begin{bmatrix}
\textbf A^{-1} &0 \\ 
 0&\textbf B^{-1}
\end{bmatrix}\left\{\epsilon_{ij} \right\}

To verify they are inverses, multiply together to get identity matrix

 \textbf C^{-1} \textbf C= \textbf I

 \textbf C^{-1} \textbf C=  \begin{bmatrix}
\textbf A^{-1}A &0 \\ 
 0&\textbf B^{-1}B
\end{bmatrix}= \textbf I

\left\{\sigma_{ij} \right\}=\begin{bmatrix}
\textbf A^{-1} &0 \\ 
 0&\textbf B^{-1}
\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}
0\\ 
0\\ 
0\\ 
0\\ 
\epsilon_{31}\\
\epsilon_{12} 
\end{bmatrix}

\sigma_{11}=0

\sigma_{22}=0

\sigma_{33}=0

\sigma_{23}=2G\epsilon_{23}=0

\sigma_{31}=2G\epsilon_{31}

\sigma_{12}=2G\epsilon_{12}

Now we move on to part C of the roadmap: Equilibrium Equation for stresses


Bidirectional Bending [edit]

Bidirectional Bending Diagram

M_{y}=\int_{A}z\sigma_{xx}dA

Similarly for x.

Moment of Inertia: I_{y},\ I_{z},\ I_{yz}

I_{y}=\int_{A}z^2dA

I_{z}=\int_{A}y^2dA

I_{yz}=\int_{A}yzdA

\sigma_{xx}=E\epsilon_{xx}

   \sigma_{xx}=\frac{I_{y}M_z-I_{yz}M_y}{I_yI_z-(I_{yz})^2}\ y\ +\frac{I_{z}M_y-I_{yz}M_z}{I_yI_z-(I_{yz})^2}\ z

Recall:

I=\begin{bmatrix}
I_{11} &I_{12}  &I_{13} \\ 
 & \begin{vmatrix}
I_{22} & I_{23}\\ 
 & I_{33}
\end{vmatrix} \\ 
 &  & 
\end{bmatrix}

Note: the denominator of the above equation is the determinant of the I matrix.

D:=I_yI_z-(I_{yz})^2

=I_{22}I_{33}-(I_{23})^2

is the determinant of \begin{bmatrix}
I_{22} &I_{23} \\ 
 I_{32}&I_{33} 
\end{bmatrix}

Neutral Axis\rightarrowBending Moment Stress = 0 \ (\sigma_{xx}=0)

Goal [edit]

Our goal is to prove:

     \frac{\partial\sigma_{yx}}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial\sigma_{zx}}{\partial z}=0\ \ \ \ (1)

Now let's use indicial notation for the above equation, where x=1, y=2, and z=3:

     \frac{\partial\sigma_{21}}{\partial x_2}+\frac{\partial\sigma_{31}}{\partial x_3}=0\ \ \ \ (2)

Recall:

    {\partial \sigma_{xx} \over \partial x} + {\partial \sigma_{yx} \over \partial y} + {\partial \sigma_{zx} \over \partial z}=0\ \ \ \ (3)

In indicial notation equation 3 becomes:

    \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{\partial\sigma_{ij}}{\partial x_i}=0\ \ \ \ (4)

Derivation of \qquad \qquad \frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}+\frac{f(x)}{A}=0 [edit]

First take the sum of all of the forces in the x direction of our 1-D model.

\sum{F_{x}}=0=-\sigma (x)A+\sigma (x+dx)A+f(x)dx

\displaystyle 0=A(-\sigma (x)+\sigma (x+dx))+f(x)dx

The term multiplied by A is expanded using a Taylor series expansion. The higher order terms are ignored so it is replaced with the equivalent below.

-\sigma (x)+\sigma (x+dx)\approx \frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}dx

This is then substituted back into the equation.

0=\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}dx+f(x)dx

The dx can be factored out and the final equation is shown below.

\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial x}+\frac{f(x)}{A}=0

Derivation of Equation 4 [edit]

Now, let's investigate the non-uniform stress field in 3-D, but without applied load and focusing on the x-direction only (i.e. w/o the other stress components to avoid cluttering the figure)

3D Stress Field.JPG


\sum{F_{x}}=0=dydz\left[-\sigma _{xx}(x,y,z) + \sigma _{xx}(x+dx,y,z) \right]+dzdx\left[-\sigma _{yx}(x,y,z) + \sigma _{yx}(x,y+dy,z) \right]+dxdz\left[-\sigma _{zx}(x,y,z) + \sigma _{zx}(x,y,z+dz) \right]

0=dxdydz\left[\frac{\partial \sigma _{xx}}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \sigma _{yx}}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \sigma _{zx}}{\partial z}\right]

0=\frac{\partial \sigma _{xx}}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial \sigma _{yx}}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial \sigma _{zx}}{\partial z}

 Note:  \sigma_{ij} is the normal stress normal to the i axis facet in the j axis direction.


\Rightarrow \ Equation\  3\ (and\ therefore\ 4)\   has\  been\  proved




Prandtl Stress function Φ [edit]

The Prandtl stress function is a special case of the Morera stress functions, in which it is assumed that A=B=0 and C is a function of x and y only.[1]



     [\sigma_{yx}]=(\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial z}) 
      [\sigma_{zx}]=(\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial y})


Φ acts as a potential function. (\sigma_{yx}, \sigma_{zx}) are components of Φ with respect to (y,z)


A brief mention should be made of the Maxwell stress functions. Maxwell stress functions are defined by assuming that the Beltrami stress tensor \Phi_{mn} tensor is restricted to be of the form [2]:

\Phi_{ij}=
\begin{bmatrix}
A&0&0\\
0&B&0\\
0&0&C
\end{bmatrix}


Substituting the expressions for the stress into the Beltrami-Michell equations yields the expression of the elastostatic problem in terms of the stress functions[3]:

\nabla^2 A=\nabla^2 B=\nabla^2 C=\left(
\frac{\partial^2 A}{\partial x^2}+
\frac{\partial^2 B}{\partial y^2}+
\frac{\partial^2 C}{\partial z^2}\right)/(2-\nu),

These must also yield a stress tensor which obeys the specified boundary conditions.


The stress tensor which automatically obeys the equilibrium equation may now be written as[2]:


\sigma_x= \frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yy}}{\partial z \partial z}
+ \frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zz}}{\partial y \partial y}
-2\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yz}}{\partial y \partial z}                


\sigma_y= \frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xx}}{\partial z \partial z}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zz}}{\partial x \partial x}
-2\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zx}}{\partial z \partial x}                



\sigma_z= \frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yy}}{\partial x \partial x}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xx}}{\partial y \partial y}
-2\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xy}}{\partial x \partial y}                


\sigma_{xy}=-\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xy}}{\partial z \partial z}
 -\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zz}}{\partial x \partial y}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yz}}{\partial x \partial y}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zx}}{\partial y \partial z}


\sigma_{yz}
=-\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yz}}{\partial x \partial x}
 -\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xx}}{\partial y \partial z}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zx}}{\partial y \partial x}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xy}}{\partial z \partial x}


\sigma_{zx}=-\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{zx}}{\partial y \partial y}
 -\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yy}}{\partial z \partial x}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{xy}}{\partial z \partial y}
 +\frac{\partial^2\Phi_{yz}}{\partial x \partial y}






References

[1]

[2]

[3]
Cite error: <ref> tags exist, but no <references/> tag was found