User:Dereckson/Survey responses
From Wikiversity
Contents |
Thank you for participating in Wikimedian Demographics! This project needs a lot of work, so please lend a hand.
First, please check for "redlink" categories. If there are some, please edit them by adding:
- [[Category:Wikimedian Demographics/Response categories]]
Nationality, residence, and travel [edit]
Dereckson in North America
Dereckson in Europe
Wikipedia [edit]
Wikimedia Commons [edit]
Computers [edit]
Politics [edit]
Hello, Dereckson, and thanks for your interest in the 2008 US presidential elections.
This survey currently contains questions about the primary campaigns.
Other questions will be added to this survey as they become available (you can request or announce new additions here).
Accepted responses to the current questions are as follows:
- Are you eligible to vote in this election? -- Please note that we are interested in the opinions of Wikimedians who are not eligible!
- Answer yes or no (y/n).
- How closely have you been following the campaigns? -- a general question
- 3 = closely ; 2 = somewhat ; 1 = not at all
- Are you a Democrat, Republican, or other? -- Questions about minor party affiliations can be added later.
- D = Democrat ; ID = Independent leaning Democrat ; IO = independent/other ; IR = independent leaning Republican ; R = Republican
- Of the Democratic Party/Republican Party candidates, which do you like the best/think will be nominated?
- Use the last name on the candidates, in ALL CAPS. "#switch:" functions will be added to the template over the next day or so, see the template page for details.
- Has your rating of the Democratic/Republican Party candidates changed since the first time you took this survey? -- opinions sometimes change
- Answer yes or no (y/n)
- How well does the Wikipedia article on the Iowa caucus/US Electoral College explain that process? -- tell us how well Wikipedia is doing! More questions of this type will be added for relevant articles and other Wikimedia resources as time goes on.
- 4 = very informative ; 3 = somewhat informative ; 2 = not informative ; 1 = misleading
- Did the results of the Iowa caucus or the New Hampshire primary affect your potential vote? -- The "pundits" have been very excited about this topic.
- answer yes or no (y/n)
Categories:
- WMDGS/Primarily contributes to Wikipedia
- WMDGS Participant
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikibooks
- WMDGS/Regularly contributes to Commons
- WMDGS/Occaisionally contributes to Wikinews
- WMDGS/Occaisionally contributes to Wikiquote
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikiversity
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikispecies
- WMDGS/Rarely contributes to Meta
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wiktionary
- WMDGS/Rarely contributes to Wikisource
- WMDGS/Regularly uses IRC
- WMDGS/Never uses Wikimedia mailinglists
- WMDGS/Male
- WMDGS/Wikimedia administrator
- WMDGS/Northeast Earth
- WMDGS/Remind me please
- WMDGS/Has visited the United States
- WMDGS/Has visited the United Kingdom
- WMDGS/Has visited France
- WMDGS/Has visited Germany
- WMDGS/Has visited Austria
- WMDGS/Has visited Italy
- WMDGS/Has visited Netherlands
- WMDGS/Citizen of Belgium
- WMDGS/Resident of Belgium
- WMDGS/Has visited Switzerland
- WMDGS Participant/Wikipedia
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/articles reliable half the time
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/articles deep half the time
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/notability interpretation too strong
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/number of policies about right
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/supports ARBCOM with improvements
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/ARBCOM member
- WMDGS/Wikipedia/never a party in an ARBCOM case
- WMGDS/Commons 1/Participant
- WMGDS/Commons/Mostly own work
- WMGDS/Commons/Often difficult to find media
- WMGDS/Commons/Occaisionaly categorizes
- WMGDS/Commons/Supports categories for all images
- WMGDS/Commons/Opposed to tools like FlickrLickr
- WMGDS/Commons/Featured media should only be from Commons users
- WMGDS/Commons/Not admin
- WMGDS/Commons/Admin activity requirements just right
- WMGDS/Commons/Never delete on request unless there are potential licensing problems