Portal talk:Philosophy

From Wikiversity
(Redirected from Topic talk:Philosophy)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is growing fast! Are you going to import the work already done on wikibooks's wikiversity? Do we need to get an admin to do it? --Cfp 18:12, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a giant list on Wikiversity:Import, but the admins are overwelmed at the moment--Rayc 21:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Importing I can't do the importing work (I'm not an admin), but I figured I can start on new content. Koavf 20:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is LockeShocke from wp, I've started adding content to a select number of courses. Glad to see this had had some recent activity!!199.44.86.185 21:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider Chinese philosophy under 4202 to be classified as spiritual rather than religious.

School:Philosophy now contains the material that was imported from Wikibooks. Topic:Philosophy should be renamed as a specialized department of School:Philosophy such as Topic:Philosophy of Science. --JWSchmidt 02:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

environmental ethics/philosphy[edit source]

I think it would be interesting to have a course on environmental philosophy. This new branch within the discipline is quite fascinating. Ideas: Leopolds ans Whites antropocentric environmental ethics; shallow and deep ecology; ecofeminism; social ethics; consequentialists vs non-consequentialists; deontoligical views; green movement ethics; land ethics; expansionnist vs ecological worldviews ....

Just ideas for now for anyone interested, i don't really have time to do it myself right now.

Merge?[edit source]

Merge the school and topic of philosophy? Emesee 19:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Links to Wikipedia deleted from old portal page[edit source]

(These would make a good foundation for a future learning project, and because I'm still a new user I'll save them here.)

Philosophy topics[edit source]

Note: Please use descriptive names for Wikiversity pages, not numbers (see: Naming conventions).

Thanks, --Luke Isham (discusscontribs) 10:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lukeisham: Thanks. I arbitrarily came up with this in... August 2006 (a few weeks after we launched). A lot has changed since then, clearly. —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You've done some good work ten years ago gathering up those links, you could turn them into a course outline. --Luke Isham (discusscontribs) 23:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
someday *sigh. —Justin (koavf)TCM 00:39, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]