Talk:Motivation and emotion/Textbook/Motivation/Narcissism

From Wikiversity
Jump to: navigation, search

The link of this page was not spelled correctly (Narcisissism), therefore when it linked to wikipedia it would then ask if an article for 'Narcisissism' would like to be created. Corrected the link so it works better now : ) (The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aszokalski (talkcontribs) 11:03, 28 August 2010.)

Thanks! -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:33, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


Chapter feedback

This textbook chapter has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see what editing changes I have made whilst reading through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below or continuing to improve the chapter if you wish. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a DI-level chapter, with a strong emphasis on theoretical understandings of narcissism, limited treatment of related research, and effective written expression and use of additional learning features such as wiki-links, images, and a quiz.

Theory[edit]

Research[edit]

Written expression[edit]

  1. Spelling, grammar and proofreading
    1. Check grammar of some sentences e.g., "While further examining how narcissism expresses itself, in both healthy and pathological forms." is not a full sentence.
  2. APA style
    1. Do not cite the year for subsequent citations within a paragraph e.g., Smith (2010) but after that in the same paragraph only refer to Smith.
    2. et al -> et al.
    3. Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 13:02, 12 December 2010 (UTC)


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this worked very well as an introduction to the chapter, with excellent production (although the sound was a bit quiet). Especially impressive was the explanation of theories about narcissism. Although the presentation works well as an introduction, I thought more could have been made of final take-away points from the chapter.
  2. Excellent opening use of self-made video and video effects.
  3. Sound was very quiet.
  4. Voice was well placed and easy to listen to. Could be improved by using more tonal variation.
  5. Very good combination of simple images & simple text.
  6. Well paced (not too slow or too fast - many others were too fast/much)
  7. Strong on theory; but limited research.
  8. No image credits?

Structure and content[edit]

Communication[edit]

Production quality[edit]

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)