Talk:Motivation and emotion/Textbook/Emotion/Neurobiology of aggression

From Wikiversity
Jump to: navigation, search


Chapter feedback

This textbook chapter has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see what editing changes I have made whilst reading through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below or continuing to improve the chapter if you wish. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

  1. This is an excellent chapter, on a challenging topic. It is very well researched, understood and explained in plain English (appropriate for the target audience). A balanced, indepth review of key literature is offered. The chapter is very well written, except for some relatively minor grammatical and proofreading errors. The chapter is well summarised. The quiz is excellent. Images and inter-wiki links were also provided appropriately.

Theory[edit]

Research[edit]

Written expression[edit]

    1. Check use of ownership apostrophes e.g., one -> one's
    2. Check your sentences starting with "While" - they are not grammatically correct sentences.
  1. APA style
    1. Images were not captioned using APA style.
    2. Do not cite the year for subsequent citations within a paragraph e.g.,


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via login to the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a strong, all-around presentation which effectively communicated key understandings about the neurobiology of aggression. This was an important strength - choosing only to focus on key points and explaining these well.
  2. Well done on using a brief sound intro.
  3. Clear sound volume and quality.
  4. Slides are clear (min. font size should be no smaller - and maybe larger)
  5. Images were used to effectively complement the text.
  6. 2nd last slide was a bit hard to read.
  7. Great pronunciation of difficult words!
  8. Source of images weren't acknowledged.

Structure and content[edit]

Communication[edit]

Production quality[edit]

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)