Nonlinear finite elements/Homework11/Solutions/Problem 1/Part 13

From Wikiversity
Jump to: navigation, search

Problem 1: Part 13: Trial elastic stress [edit]

Starting from equation (3) show that


\mathbf{s}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} = \mathbf{s}_n + 2~\mu~(\mathbf{e}_{n+1} - \mathbf{e}_n)

where \mathbf{s} is the deviatoric part of \boldsymbol{\sigma} and \mathbf{e} is the deviatoric part of \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}.

From equation (3) we have


\begin{align}
\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} & =
[\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 

2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1}] -
[\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^p_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 

2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^p_n] \\
& =
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^p_n)\\
& =
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n +
 \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^e_n)\\
& =
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^e_n +
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n) \\
& =
\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n +
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)
\end{align}

The deviatoric parts of the stress and strain are


\mathbf{s}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} = \boldsymbol{\sigma}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} -
 \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} 

~;~~
\mathbf{e}_{n+1} = \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol

{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} ~;~~
\mathbf{e}_n = \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n - \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}(\mathbf{e}_n)~\boldsymbol

{\mathit{1}}

Therefore,


\begin{align}
\mathbf{s}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} & = \boldsymbol{\sigma}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} -
 \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\sigma}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} \\
& =
\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n +
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n) -
\frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n}~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} - \frac{1}{3}~\text

{tr}[
\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)]
~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}
\end{align}

Now,


(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n) =
 \lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} +
 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} -
 \lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} -
 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n

Therefore,


 \begin{align}
 \text{tr}[
(\lambda~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\otimes\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\mathsf

{I}}):(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)] & =
 \lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}) +
 2~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1}) -
 \lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}) -
 2~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n) \\
 & =
 3~\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1}) +
 2~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1}) -
 3\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n) -
 2~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)
 \end{align}

Hence


\begin{align}
\mathbf{s}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} = &~
\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n - \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}_n} +
\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + 

2~\mu~\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} -
\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} - 2~\mu~\boldsymbol

{\varepsilon}_n \\
&~~ - \lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} -
\cfrac{2}{3}~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} +
\lambda~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} + \cfrac{2}{3}

~\mu~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}} \\
= & ~
\mathbf{s}_n + 2~\mu~\left(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1} - \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}

(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_{n+1})~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\right)
- 2~\mu~\left(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}_n - \frac{1}{3}~\text{tr}(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}

_n)~\boldsymbol{\mathit{1}}\right) \\
= & ~
\mathbf{s}_n + 2~\mu~\mathbf{e}_{n+1} - 2~\mu~\mathbf{e}_n
\end{align}

This shows that


{
\mathbf{s}_{n+1}^{\text{trial}} = \mathbf{s}_n + 2~\mu~(\mathbf{e}_{n+1} - \mathbf{e}_n)
}