New Zealand Law and Practice Examination/Criminal Law
From Wikiversity
Topics to be covered:
Contents |
[edit] Liability
[edit] Mens Rea
see Mens Rea
[edit] Secondaries and Complicity Liability
see Secondaries and Complicity Liability
[edit] Accessories after the fact
see Accessories after the fact
[edit] Attempt
see Attempt
[edit] Threatening
see Threatening
[edit] Conspiracy
see Conspiracy
[edit] Offences against the Person
[edit] Homicide
see Homicide
[edit] Assault
see Assault
[edit] Sexual Crimes
see Sex Crimes
[edit]
[edit] Theft
see Theft
[edit] Receiving
see Receiving
[edit] Burglary
see Burglary
[edit] Robbery
see Robbery
[edit] Blackmail
see Blackmail
[edit] Demanding with intent to steal
see Demanding
[edit] Other
[edit] Drugs
- Misuse of Drugs Act 1975
[edit] Summary Offences
- Summary Offences Act 1981
[edit] Traffic Offences
- Land Transport Act 1998
[edit] Domestic Violence
- Domestic Violence Act 1995
[edit] Harassment
- Harassment Act 1997
- R v D [2000] 2 NZLR 641
[edit] Defences
[edit] Mistake
Where no intention, knowledge or recklessness exists due to mistake (even if the mistake is not reasonable).
- R v Wood
- R v Metuariki
[edit] Self-Defence
- Use of force or the threat of force in the defence of self or another.
- Force that defendant believes in the circumstances to be reasonable.
- Elements of the offence must require force.
- The prosecution must first prove prima facie case involving mens rea.
[edit] Insanity
Person labouring under:
- (a) natural imbecility or
- (b) disease of the mind
- such that the person is:
- (i) incapable of understanding the nature and quality of act; or
- (ii) incapable of knowing that act is morally wrong having regard to commonly accepted standards of right and wrong.
[edit] Compulsion
- Threats of immediate death or gbh by a person present when offence commit
- Defendant must believe threats will be carried out.
- Not available for a number of offences, including murder, gbh, treason, kidnapping, robeery arson, piracy etc.
[edit] Necessity
[edit] Definition
Person not necessarily entirely deprived of choice but choice btwn two evils
- (a) to allow harm; or
- (b) break the law
[edit] Commentary
Requires:
- situation of urgency or moral peril;
- compliance with the law to be impossible;
- harm to be proportionate;
- nexus between the peril and response.
Necessity is a common law defence that is saved by s20 of the Crimes Act.
It is not available:
- (a) to a charge of murder; or
- (b) in the case of a threat of person not present (because the latter would contradict the defence of compulsion)
[edit] Cases
[edit] Automatism
Unconscious involuntary act performed without conscious volition.
[edit] Intoxication
- No a defence in itself.
- May negate mens rea.
- available only where specific intent required for offence.
[edit] Provocation
see Provocation
[edit] Bill of Rights Act
see BORA
[edit] Procedure
- Part XII Crimes Act 1961
- Part II Summary Proceedings Act 1957
- Part IV Summary Proceedings Act 1957
[edit] Jurisdiction
- Part I Summary Proceedings Act 1957
- Part IIA District Courts Act 1947
[edit] Appeals
- Part XIII Crimes Act 1961
- Part IV Summary Proceedings Act 1957
- R v Ramage
- R v Radich
- R v Watson
- R v Clark
- R v Donaldson
[edit] Bail
- Bail Act 2000
- B v Police (No 2)
- G v Police
- R v Fatu (unreported)
[edit] Capacity/Mental Health
- Intellectual Disability (Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation) Act 2003
- Criminal Procedure (Mentally Impaired Persons) Act 2003
[edit] Sentencing
- Part II Crimes Act
- Criminal Justice Act 1985
- Sentencing Act 2002
- R v Tuaeki
[edit] Definitions
Aggravating Factor: one which would justify a greater penalty if the court accepts it as a factor.
Mitigating Factor: one which would justify a lesser penalty if the court accepts it as a factor.
Supervision sentence: 6 mths to 1 year.
Community work: 40 to 400 hrs.
[edit] Evidence
see Evidence